On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:08:41AM +0300, Max Kirillov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I would like to announce git-push-update, a tool which emulates
> server-side merge or rebase.
>
> The link: https://github.com/max630/git-push-update
>
> It is a bash script which fetches latest remote branch, creates
>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:31:24PM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote:
> This passes each group to the `submodule update` invocation and
> additionally configures the groups to be automatically updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
> ---
>
> This is a resend of the patch "[PATCH 5/5] builtin/clone:
Signed-off-by: Trevor Saunders
---
The test change only kind of tests the change in behavior and doesn't seem all
that useful. However I'm not sure if its preferable to not even try and test
that something isn't output.
bisect.c| 7 ++-
t/t6030-bisect-p
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 12:07:04AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:03:41PM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 05:29:42PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Trevor Saunders
> > > w
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 07:46:15PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
>
> On 2015-04-15 17:33, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 04:41:42PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2015-04-15 16:18, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> &
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 04:41:42PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> On 2015-04-15 16:18, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 April 2015 07:22 PM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> >> What would that require git to do, beyond taking whatever you tell it
> >> (using GIT_SSH or _GIT_
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:05:02PM -0400, Brandon McCaig wrote:
> Trevor:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Trevor Saunders
> wrote:
> > I would expect the answers to be it sets the working directories state
> > to the state in HEAD, and leaves untracked files alone.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:24:04PM -0700, Quinn Taylor wrote:
> I'm still fairly new to git (coming from svn) and have found `git stash` to
> be really useful for storing in-progress work to resume later, as one might
> otherwise do with diff/patch files. (With the git tools I use, I find `git
>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 09:01:48PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Am 20.03.2015 um 01:13 schrieb Trevor Saunders:
> >On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:15:19PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>Trevor Saunders writes:
> >>I have a feeling that an optional feature that allows &q
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:15:19PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Trevor Saunders writes:
>
> > On one hand it seems kind of user hostile to just toss out any changes
> > in the submodule that are uncommitted, on the other for any other path
> > it would seem weird to h
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:53:10AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Trevor Saunders writes:
>
> > If a user does git checkout HEAD -- path/to/submodule they'd expect the
> > submodule to be checked out to the commit that submodule is at in HEAD.
>
> Hmmm.
>
with
git's internals and I'm not sure if this is even wanted so I'm starting
simple. If people want this to work I can try and do something better.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Saunders
---
entry.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 03:22:11PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Trevor Saunders writes:
>
> >> ... For these "per-invocation" differences, attributes
> >> to declare permenent/inherent nature of the contents is much less
> >> suited than per-invoca
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 07:06:16PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Trevor Saunders writes:
>
> > There have been cases where I wanted grep to always ignore certain
> > files, but to still get text diffs for those files. One case is people
> > insist on using ChangeL
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:11:08PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:01:22AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Jeff King writes:
> >
> > > So I think _if_ using "diff" attributes is enough for this purpose, then
> > > there is no code to be written. But if somebody wants to
15 matches
Mail list logo
