y. git log
> and git patch now also accept range of commits, so e.g. if you do
Here's a patch to let people know about the nice color feature.
Signed-off-by: Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: git
===
--- 0a9ee5a4d9
On Thursday 21 April 2005 06:54 pm, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Duh. And they say "Where possible terminfo is consulted to find the
> string to use." in their manual page. :/
>
> > gitlog.sh: 6d24d857fb6c2f7e810954adaca1990599906f07
> > --- a/gitlog.sh
> > +++ b/gitlog.sh
> > @@ -11,11 +11,11 @@
> >
>
Executive summary: I received some alarming errors while doing
a git pull of the latest kernel from kernel.org, but it appears
that all is well. Continue reading for the gory details.
I updated my git-pasky tools this morning, by doing "git pasky pull", "make", "make
install".
Working from a repo
On Thursday 21 April 2005 01:11 am, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:20:27AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > Actually, I meant "patch -p1
> So, how did it end up?
The file listed in the di
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 05:15 pm, Steven Cole wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 April 2005 05:12 pm, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 01:06:09AM CEST, I got a letter
> > where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > > After getting the
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 05:12 pm, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 01:06:09AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > After getting the latest tarball, and make, make install:
&g
After getting the latest tarball, and make, make install:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] git-pasky-0.6.2]$ git pull pasky
MOTD: Welcome to Petr Baudis' rsync archive.
MOTD:
MOTD: If you are pulling my git branch, please do not repeat that
MOTD: every five minutes or so - new stuff is likely not going to
MOT
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:51:18 +0200 Petr Baudis wrote:
| Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 11:19:19PM CEST, I got a letter
| where Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
| > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:56:33PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
| > > The short command version will
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 05:38 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
> >
> > I wasn't complaining about the 4 minutes, just the lack of feedback
> > during the majority of that time. And most of it was after the last
> > patchin
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 04:38 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
> >
> > But perhaps a progress bar right about here might be
> > a good thing for the terminally impatient.
> >
> > real3m54.909s
> > user
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just
fine.
Yup, it all seems to work out.
[many files patched]
patching file mm/mmap.c
patching file net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
patching file scripts/ver_linux
---
David Greaves wrote:
Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:35:15PM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
I've been working on git.pl and getting help working nicely
things to try:
git.pl help
git.pl add
git.pl add --help
git.p
Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:42:26AM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
[snippage]
This patch will provide the comment lines in the shell script associated
with the command, cleaned up a bit for presentation.
BUGS: Thi
David Greaves wrote:
Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:40:54AM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
Here is perhaps a better way to provide detailed help for each
git command. A command.help file for each command can be
written
On Monday 18 April 2005 10:59 am, Steven Cole wrote:
> Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:42:26AM CEST, I got a letter
> > where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> [snippage]
> >
> >>This patch will provide the comme
Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:42:26AM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
[snippage]
This patch will provide the comment lines in the shell script associated
with the command, cleaned up a bit for presentation.
BUGS: Thi
ll also print any comments in the entire file, which may
not be desired. If a command name and shell script filename
do not follow the usual convention, this won't work, e.g. ci for commit.
Signed-off-by: Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- gp-newest-orig/git 2005-04-17 22:16:55.0
On Sunday 17 April 2005 08:03 am, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 07:36:51AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > This is a fairly trivial addition, but if users are adding remote
> > repositories
>
: Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
diff -urN git-pasky-orig/git git-pasky/git
--- git-pasky-orig/git 2005-04-16 22:47:22.0 -0600
+++ git-pasky/git 2005-04-16 22:49:14.0 -0600
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
log
ls [TREE_ID]
lsobj [OBJTYPE]
+ lsremote
merge -b BASE_ID F
On Thursday 14 April 2005 01:40 pm, Andrew Timberlake-Newell wrote:
> Zach Welch pontificated:
> > I imagine quite a few folks expect something not entirely unlike an SCM
> > to emerge from these current efforts. Moreover, Petr's 'git' scripts
> > wrap your "filesystem" plumbing to that very end.
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
