On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:10:24AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:53:27AM +0100, Peter Baumann wrote:
>
> > > covers the basics (current behavior and intent of the change) in its
> > > first two paragraphs and anyone wanting more detail can use
>
Dropping the Cc list, as this is off topic
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:05:29PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the thorough explanation. Perhaps some of that could make
> > it's way into the commit message?
>
> It's fine with me if it doesn't, since the or
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:29:53AM -0400, Christopher Marshall wrote:
> >
> > I had a similar problem, but I solved it using "ignore-paths" and
> > "ignore-refs".
> > If I remember correctly, you need to set both to ignore bdir directly
> > without
> > ignoring b3, b4,...
> >
> > For ignore-refs,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:23:16PM -0400, Christopher Marshall wrote:
> I would like to use git svn to clone an svn repo with a non-standard
> branches layout roughly like this:
> trunk/
> tags/
> branches/
>b1
>b2
>...
>bdir/
> b3
> b4
> ...
>
> That is, every di
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:52:58PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> Peter Baumann wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 08:45:10PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > > Peter Baumann wrote:
> > > > + for my $suffix (qw(yaml db)) {
> > > > +
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 08:45:10PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> Peter Baumann wrote:
> > Therefore the easiest solution to clear the cache is to delete the files
> > on disk in 'git svn reset'. Normally, deleting the files behind the back
> > of the memoization modul
27;. Normally, deleting the files behind the back
of the memoization module would be problematic, because the in-memory
representation would still exist and contain wrong data. Fortunately, the
memoization is active in memory only for a small portion of the code.
Invalidat
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 08:58:21PM +0200, Ralf Thielow wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
> > Ralf Thielow venit, vidit, dixit 05.07.2012 20:16:
> > Is "rebase" = "Neuaufbau"? My last thought on this wording was "rebase"
> > =
> > "Umpflanzen".
> >>>
>
8 matches
Mail list logo