> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Junio C Hamano writes:
>>
>>> Manuel Ullmann writes:
>>>
>>> Hmmm, I tend to agree, modulo a minor fix.
>>>
>>> If the description were in a context inside a paragraph like t
confusion. I think the second paragraph should be
sufficient for documentation.
Best regards
Manuel
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> Manuel Ullmann writes:
>>
>> Hmmm, I tend to agree, modulo a minor fix.
>>
>> If the description were in a context inside a para
Hi,
there is a mistake in the git-bisect description.
The second paragraph of it says ‘the terms "old" and "new" can be used
in place of "good" and "bad"’. So from a logical point of view the
description part stating the usage syntax should be:
git bisect (bad|good) []
git bisect (old|new) [...]
3 matches
Mail list logo
