On 19-03-25 12:39, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
| On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:08:47PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
| >
| > On Mon, Mar 25 2019, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
| >
| > > When a git process runs in the background, it doesn't display
| > > progress, only the final "done" line [1]. T
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:29:30PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
| Windows does not have process groups. It is, therefore, the simplest
| to pretend that each process is in its own process group.
|
| [...]
|
| diff --git a/compat/mingw.h b/compat/mingw.h
| index 7b523cf..a552026 1006
Disable the display of the progress if stderr is not the
current foreground process.
Still display the final result when done.
Signed-off-by: Luke Mewburn
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre
---
progress.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:01:04AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
| > That's what happens; the suppression only occurs if the process is
| > currently background. If I start a long-running operation (such as "git
| > fsck"), the progress is displayed. I then suspend & background, and the
| >
Updated patch where is_foreground_fd() is only called in display()
just before the output is to be displayed.
From d87997509fc631b8cdc7db63f289102d6ddfe933 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luke Mewburn
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:30:51 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] progress: no progress in background
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:11:09AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
| What if you suspend the task and push it into the background? Would be
| nice to inhibit progress display in that case, and resume it if the task
| returns to the foreground.
That's what happens; the suppression only occurs i
getpgid(0) in a member of struct progress
in start_progress_delay(), since this value shouldn't change
during the life of the process.
regards,
Luke.
From 843a367bac87674666dafbaf7fdb7d6b0e1660f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luke Mewburn
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:30:51 +1000
Subject: [PATCH
7 matches
Mail list logo
