Re: git stash deletes/drops changes of

John Keeping keeping.me.uk> writes: > I wonder if this would be better as a file rather than another option to > git-update-index. We already have .git/info/exclude so we could add > .git/info/freeze or .git/info/local with the same syntax as the normal > .gitignore file. .git/info/freeze would

Re: git stash deletes/drops changes of

Phil Hord gmail.com> writes: > The wording of --ignore-changes suffers the same lack of clarity that > --assume-unchanged does. > What's better? --sequester is probably too obscure. Maybe --hold. > Or --silence. Or --shut-up. How about --freeze? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the l

Re: git stash deletes/drops changes of

Adeodato Simó net.com.org.es> writes: > I was unpleasantly surprised to discover yesterday that doing `git > stash` on a repository where I had previously run `git update-index > --assume-unchanged FOO` completely lost all changes I had in file FOO. I just ran into this today. Was a decision ab