ebase (--continue | --abort | --skip)
If that is not the case, please
rm -fr ".git/rebase-apply"
and run me again. I am stopping in case you still have something
valuable there.
I resolved this issue by
git checkout -f some_br
But this issues should not occur
--
Best regards,
Eugen Konkov
::DbBatch split(/,/,q{list.conf;l 0;q});;
> 1: sub t0 {
> x2: 1;
> @@ -235,6 +237,7 @@ ab>>2: 2;
> @@ list from last
> -e:0010 t2();
>
> +-e
> 14:
> 15:
> 16:
> @@ -243,6 +246,7 @@ ab>>2: 2;
> @@ list middle
> -e:0010 t2();
>
> +-e
> x5: t0();
> 6: }
> 7: sub t2 {
> $ git --version
> git version 2.22.0
--
Best regards,
Eugen Konkov
43,6 +246,7 @@ ab>>2: 2;
@@ list middle
-e:0010 t2();
+-e
x5: t0();
6: }
7: sub t2 {
$ git --version
git version 2.22.0
--
Best regards,
Eugen Konkov
;static',1)"
> +);
+$sth->>execute( $package->login );
> +
> +$sth = $radius_dbh->prepare(
> +"INSERT INTO radcheck ( username, attribute, op, value ) values ( ?,
> ?, ?, ? )"
> +);
> +# my $package_type = $package->Invoice->Order->Tariff->type;
> +my $pass = $package->password;
> +($pass) = (`smbencrypt $pass` =~ /([^\s]+)$/s);
+$sth->>execute( $package->login, 'NT-Password', ':=', $pass //'');
+$sth->>execute( $package->login, 'NAS-Identifier', '=~', 'ppp' );
> +
> +$sth = $radius_dbh->prepare(
> +"INSERT INTO radreply ( username, attribute, op, value,
> nasip) values ( ?, 'Framed-IP-Address', '=', ?, ? )"
> +);
> +my $ip = $package->Ips->first;
+# $sth->>execute( $package->login, $ip->ip, $ip->Listener->first->nas_ip );
> +
+$radius_dbh->>commit;
> +# NOTICE: This is a bit inconsistent
> +# if whole payment failed we will have radius account without payment
++>>>>>>>> Stashed changes
>
>
> return $package;
> Why updated upstream block is so small?
> ++<<<<<<< Updated upstream
> + # NOTICE: This is a bit inconsistent
> + # if whole payment failed we will have radius account without payment
> + };
> ++||| merged common ancestors
>
> I suppose it should start from to line line:
> + $radius_dbh->begin_work;
> ...
> +# if whole payment failed we will have radius account without payment
--
Best regards,
Eugen Konkov
$sth->execute( $package->login, 'NAS-Identifier', '=~', 'ppp' );
+
+$sth = $radius_dbh->prepare(
+"INSERT INTO radreply ( username, attribute, op, value, nasip) values
( ?, 'Framed-IP-Address', '=', ?, ? )"
+);
+my $ip = $package->Ips->first;
+# $sth->execute( $package->login, $ip->ip, $ip->Listener->first->nas_ip );
+
+$radius_dbh->commit;
+# NOTICE: This is a bit inconsistent
+# if whole payment failed we will have radius account without payment
++>>>>>>> Stashed changes
return $package;
Why updated upstream block is so small?
++<<<<<<< Updated upstream
+ # NOTICE: This is a bit inconsistent
+ # if whole payment failed we will have radius account without payment
+ };
++||| merged common ancestors
I suppose it should start from to line line:
+ $radius_dbh->begin_work;
...
+# if whole payment failed we will have radius account without payment
--
Best regards,
Eugen Konkov
]
tool = sublimerge
colorMoved = default
colorMovedWS = ignore-all-space
--
Best regards,
Eugen Konkov
diff
Description: Binary data
Hi, Jeff.
JK> For example, if you have the content:
JK> foo();
JK> bar();
JK> baz();
JK> and one side makes it:
JK> foo();
JK> x = 1;
JK> bar();
JK> baz();
JK> and the other side does:
JK> foo();
JK> bar();
JK> y = 2;
JK> baz();
JK> you _could_ argue that those changes
Здравствуйте, Junio.
Вы писали 13 апреля 2015 г., 8:32:33:
JCH> Eugen Konkov writes:
>> I agree with your complex example.
JCH> Note that it is a norm, not anything complex, that we do not rename
JCH> a file wholesale.
>> But it will be great to guess in simple case,
8 matches
Mail list logo