commits to automatically mention branch names, but for regular commits
this is considered harmful?
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Antoine Pelisse wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Ed Hutchins wrote:
>> On the other hand
>> trying to figure
>> out the history of eve
o reason about or display
the history of the project and is an irritating defect in an otherwise
wonderful tool.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Matthieu Moy
wrote:
> Ed Hutchins writes:
>
>> I realize that branch names are ephemeral repo-specific things, but it
>> would be
for example).
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ed Hutchins writes:
>
>> I realize that branch names are ephemeral repo-specific things, but it
>> would be really useful to be able to determine what branch a commit
>> was authored from (as a hi
I realize that branch names are ephemeral repo-specific things, but it
would be really useful to be able to determine what branch a commit
was authored from (as a hint to ancestry graph layout tools, for
example). Is there any way to do this currently, is it planned, or
would it be deemed useful en
4 matches
Mail list logo
