On 11 February 2016 at 11:31, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> So it should suffice to mention it in the release notes as one
> bullet item that describes one positive change, among all other
> updates described in a simlar way. And there is no special
> "warnings for existing users" necessary, I would sa
Thanks for looking into the patch.
> Thanks. I, being a non-user of vim, was wondering if people who had
> their own user-defined commands (macros? and possibly short-cut keys
> to invoke them) built around the old (and odd) numbering need to
> adjust--in which case we may need to forewarn.
>
Vim
change reorders the buffers to have the same index as windows while
keeping the cursor default to the merged result as the bottom window.
Signed-off-by: Dickson Wong
---
mergetools/vimdiff | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mergetools/vimdiff b/mergetools
3 matches
Mail list logo
