Re: [PATCH] git: add --no-optional-locks option

2017-09-21 Thread Daniel Santos
On 09/20/2017 11:32 PM, Jeff King wrote: > Johannes, this is an adaptation of your 67e5ce7f63 (status: offer *not* > to lock the index and update it, 2016-08-12). Folks working on GitHub > Desktop complained to me that it's only available on Windows. :) > > I expanded the scope a bit to let us give

Re: KDevelop developers obviously don't use git :(

2017-09-21 Thread Daniel Santos
On 09/21/2017 11:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Daniel Santos writes: > >> So first I need to inquire if there is a current mechanism to say "git >> status, but please fail if you're busy with a non-atomic operation". > Reading this list sometimes mak

KDevelop developers obviously don't use git :(

2017-09-21 Thread Daniel Santos
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219 $ git push minor-rant-warning KDevelop has a despicable habit of performing `git status --porcelain` whenever it damn well pleases ... or rather when it sees an alteration.  This this breaks git rebase because it grabs the $*()&@#$ lock file, often lead