>As a native English speaker, I find the new phrasing odd, and think
>this may a step backward. How about trying a different approach? For
>example:
>Occasionally, the maintainer may get merge conflicts when trying
>to pull changes from downstream. In this case, it may make sense
>to a
>The document starts with
>This document attempts to write down and motivate some of the
>workflow elements used for `git.git` itself. Many ideas apply
>in general, though the full workflow is rarely required for
>smaller projects with fewer people involved.
>and makes me wonder (note: I
2 matches
Mail list logo
