Cannot Open Page 1 2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
gabrielreyes...@gmail.com
Attention, utilisateur de messagerie,
Certains messages entrants importants ont été bloqués par la sécurité de
domaine de messagerie jusqu'à la vérification de votre compte.
LA MISE À JOUR EST GRATUITE et ne prendra que quelques secondes ...
Veuillez mettre à niveau et vérifier votre boîte au
Dear friend,
Greetings to you, I got your contact through International business
directory, my names are Hon.Dr. James Kabore from Burkina Faso, West
Africa. I am a politician with government position. am pleased to
contact you for your assistance to help me invest in real estate or
any provitable
Allow read_object_file_extended() to be called by multiple threads
protecting it with a lock. The lock usage can be toggled with
enable_obj_read_lock() and disable_obj_read_lock().
Probably there are many spots in read_object_file_extended()'s call
chain that could be executed unlocked (and thus,
git-grep has locks around the object reading operations it performs. But
these have an internal lock now, which can be enabled through
enable_obj_read_lock(). So let's use it and drop git-grep's ones.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares
---
builtin/grep.c | 18 +++---
grep.c | 3
They were disabled at 53b8d93 ("grep: disable threading in non-worktree
case", 12-12-2011), due to observable perfomance drops. But now that
zlib inflation can be performed in parallel, we can regain the speedup.
Grep'ing 'abcd[02]' ("Regex 1") and '(static|extern) (int|double) \*'
("Regex 2") at
Threads were disabled in git-grep for non-worktree case at 53b8d93
("grep: disable threading in non-worktree case", 12-12-2011), due to
perfomance drops.
To regain performance, this series work on the object reading code so
that zlib inflation may be performed in parallel. This is a good hotspot
Rohit Ashiwal writes:
> @@ -1688,10 +1699,12 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const
> char *prefix)
> state_dir_base, cmd_live_rebase, buf.buf);
> }
>
> + if (options.committer_date_is_author_date)
> + options.flags |= REBASE_FORCE;
> +
>
There's a loop that creates 30 commits using test_commit. Using
test_commit_bulk speeds this up from:
Benchmark #1: ./t6200-fmt-merge-msg.sh --root=/var/ram/git-tests
Time (mean ± σ): 1.926 s ± 0.240 s[User: 1.055 s, System: 0.963 s]
Range (min … max):1.431 s … 2.166 s
There are two loops that create 32 commits each using test_commit. Using
test_commit_bulk speeds this up from:
Benchmark #1: ./t5702-protocol-v2.sh --root=/var/ram/git-tests
Time (mean ± σ): 5.409 s ± 0.513 s[User: 2.382 s, System: 2.466 s]
Range (min … max):4.633 s … 5.92
There are two loops that create 33 commits each using test_commit. Using
test_commit_bulk speeds this up from:
Benchmark #1: ./t5703-upload-pack-ref-in-want.sh --root=/var/ram/git-tests
Time (mean ± σ): 2.142 s ± 0.161 s[User: 1.136 s, System: 0.974 s]
Range (min … max):1.9
Some tests need to create a string of commits. Doing this with
test_commit is very heavy-weight, as it needs at least one process per
commit (and in fact, uses several).
For bulk creation, we can do much better by using fast-import, but it's
often a pain to generate the input. Let's provide a help
The bitmap index we compute in t5310 has only 20 commits in it. This
gives poor coverage of bitmap_writer_select_commits(), which simply
writes a bitmap for everything when there are fewer than 100 commits.
Let's bump the number of commits in the test to cover the more complex
code paths (this doe
One of the tests in t3311 creates 300 commits by running "test_commit"
in a loop. This requires 900 processes. Instead, we can use
test_commit_bulk to do it with only four. This improves the runtime of
the script from:
Benchmark #1: ./t3311-notes-merge-fanout.sh --root=/var/ram/git-tests
Tim
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 01:27:38PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * jk/test-commit-bulk (2019-07-02) 7 commits
> - SQUASH???
> - t6200: use test_commit_bulk
> - t5703: use test_commit_bulk
> - t5702: use test_commit_bulk
> - t3311: use test_commit_bulk
> - t5310: increase the number of bitma
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Rohit Ashiwal writes:
>
>> Another revision to keep this thread alive.
>
> And on top of what commit have these two been built on?
I had trouble figuring out where to base the other one, on top of
which these two apply. Why are these split into separate topics?
Rohit Ashiwal writes:
> t/t3431-rebase-options-compatibility.sh | 66 +
Isn't 3431 already taken?
> 5 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 t/t3431-rebase-options-compatibility.sh
> ...
> + git checkout --orphan master &&
> + q_to
Rohit Ashiwal writes:
> Another revision to keep this thread alive.
And on top of what commit have these two been built on?
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:14:49PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> >
> >> This is a WIP series I have that I figured I'd send out as-is for
> >> comment since Junio said he'd be merging dl/rebase-i-keep-base down.
> >>
> >> So I want
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
The sixth batch is in and the 'nex
Alban Gruin writes:
>> > + test_i18ncmp expect.2 actual &&
>> > + cp .git/rebase-merge/git-rebase-todo.backup \
>> > + .git/rebase-merge/git-rebase-todo &&
>>
>> Why? Who uses this copy?
>>
>
> The same technique is used in "rebase -i respects rebase.missingCommitsCheck
> =
> erro
"cclauss via GitGitGadget" writes:
> From: cclauss
I'll tweak this line (and your sign-off) to read as "Christian
Clauss " as you had in your cover letter.
> Several things were changed between Python 2 and Python 3.
> There are a few Python 3 incompatibilities to work on.
> Here we are making
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> Just wanted to drop a quick note and let everyone know that Git 2.20.1
> builds on both Fedora 1 and Ubuntu 4. I use Fedora 1 and Ubuntu 4 for
> regression tests for some other libraries. It is easier to use the old
> distros then building old GCC's and glibc's on modern
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
>> This is a WIP series I have that I figured I'd send out as-is for
>> comment since Junio said he'd be merging dl/rebase-i-keep-base down.
>>
>> So I wanted to test it, and as seen early in this series in 3/13 and
>> 4/13 we had signi
Carlo Arenas writes:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 6:31 PM Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>
>> This makes sense to me. Not really for the 'for' loop declaration
>> aspect: for that, I'd want some more specialized tool that allows
>> turning on such a check specifically. But more because Ubuntu trusty
>>
Hi Everyone,
Just wanted to drop a quick note and let everyone know that Git 2.20.1
builds on both Fedora 1 and Ubuntu 4. I use Fedora 1 and Ubuntu 4 for
regression tests for some other libraries. It is easier to use the old
distros then building old GCC's and glibc's on modern platforms.
Git has
Hi,
Le 18/07/2019 à 21:55, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> Alban Gruin writes:
> > In a todo list, `done_nr' is the amount of commands that were executed
> > or skipped, but skip_unnecessary_picks() did not update it.
>
> OK. Together with 3/9 and this one, any increment of total_nr and
> done_nr in
Hi,
Le 18/07/2019 à 22:04, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> Alban Gruin writes:
> > The total amount of commands can be used to show the progression of the
> > rebasing in a shell. This number is written to the disk by
> > read_populate_todo() when the todo list is loaded from
> > sequencer_continue()
Hi,
Le 18/07/2019 à 21:52, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> Alban Gruin writes:
> > `total_nr' is the total amount of items, done and toto, that are in a
>
> "amount" -> "number" perhaps. Also s/toto/todo/ perhaps but I am
> not sure what you wanted to say here, so...
>
`total_nr' is the number of
Hi Junio,
Le 18/07/2019 à 20:31, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> Alban Gruin writes:
> > When set to "warn" or "error", `rebase.missingCommitCheck' would make
> > rebase -i warn if the user removed commits from the todo list to prevent
> > mistakes. Unfortunately, rebase --edit-todo and rebase --cont
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
>> You probably forgot that I already proposed that, long time ago:
>> https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1494509599.git.johannes.schinde...@gmx.de/
>
> No, I haven't. It was actually meant as an invitation to you to
> help us come up with
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> You probably forgot that I already proposed that, long time ago:
> https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1494509599.git.johannes.schinde...@gmx.de/
No, I haven't. It was actually meant as an invitation to you to
help us come up with a reasonable deprecation path.
I'd
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> I have to admit that I'd _much_ rather see the strategy of
> `fetch_populated_submodules()` emulated, where it uses the
> `run_processes_parallel_tr2()` function to perform the actual fetches.
Good. Thanks for chiming in.
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget"
>> writes:
>>
>> > From: Johannes Schindelin
>> >
>> > Without an error message when `lstat()` failed, `git clean` would
>> > abort without an error message, leaving the user qui
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Without this patch, and without removing support for `.git/branches/`,
> you force the Visual Studio build to _not_ pass the test suite. It's as
> simple as that.
I see it as deficiency of the build procedure. What makes it so
different, compared to "make" we type
Hi Junio,
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget"
> writes:
>
> > From: Johannes Schindelin
> >
> > It is a real old anachronism from the Cogito days to have a
> > .git/branches/ directory. And to have tests that ensure that Cogito
> > users can migra
We wish to inform you of your abandoned fund which has been approved and is
ready for payout.
Please respond to enable the payout department (E.F.C.C) to contact you with
more details.
Mr John Ron E-mail: johnronconsult...@aliyun.com
Sincerely,
Mr. Ibrahim Mustafa Magu
CHAIRMAN ECONOMIC & FINA
Several things were changed between Python 2 and Python 3. Here we are
making changes to make the code run on both Py2 and Py3. We are doing this
because the end of life of Python 2 is in 167 days. We are using print()
function because legacy print statements are syntax errors on Py3.reduce()
was
From: cclauss
Several things were changed between Python 2 and Python 3.
There are a few Python 3 incompatibilities to work on.
Here we are making changes to make the code run on both Py2 and Py3.
We are doing this because the end of life of Python 2 is in 167 days.
We are using print() function
Hi Junio,
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Palmer Dabbelt writes:
>
> > * As I was writing the documentation I found "fetch --jobs". It seems
> > like I should use that instead of adding a new argrument, but I wasn't
> > sure.
>
> Why not? What makes you feel it is a bad idea t
Hi Junio,
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget"
> writes:
>
> > From: Johannes Schindelin
> >
> > Without an error message when `lstat()` failed, `git clean` would
> > abort without an error message, leaving the user quite puzzled.
>
> Let's drop th
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Sergey Organov writes:
>
>> Junio C Hamano writes:
>>
>>> Sergey Organov writes:
>>>
>>> But the point is, if M and N are equally well tested before
>>> publication, they may still have bugs resulting from subtle
>>> interactions between A and F..X that is not discover
42 matches
Mail list logo
