This empty file was inadvertently introduced in commit 4f39cd8 ("pack:
move pack name-related functions", 2017-08-23). Remove this file.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
---
outgoing/packfile.h | 0
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 outgoing/packfile.h
diff --git a/
On 8/28/2017 4:28 PM, Kevin Willford wrote:
The code was using two string_lists, one for the directories and
one for the files. The code never checks the lists independently
so we should be able to only use one list. The string_list also
is a O(log n) for lookup and insertion. Switching this
On 8/28/2017 4:28 PM, Kevin Willford wrote:
The return value of the get_files_dirs call is never being used.
Looking at the history of the file and it was originally only
being used for debug output statements. Also when
read_tree_recursive return value is non zero it is changed to
zero. This
On 8/28/2017 4:28 PM, Kevin Willford wrote:
In merge_trees if process_renames or process_entry returns less
than zero, the method will just return and not free re_merge,
re_head, or entries.
This change cleans up the allocated variables before returning
to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wil
On 08/28, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> This new binary was introduced in commit 3921a0b ("perf: add test for
> writing the index", 2017-08-21), but a .gitignore entry was not added
> for it. Add that entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
Looks good to me
> ---
> t/helper/.gitignore | 1 +
> 1 file c
On 8/21/2017 1:43 PM, Martin Ågren wrote:
This is the second version of my series to try to address some issues
...
2) hashmap_add, which I could try my hands on if Jeff doesn't beat me to
it -- his proposed change should fix it and I doubt I could come up with
anything "better", considering
After the previous patch, none of the functions we call hold on to
`referent.buf`, so we can safely release the string buffer before
returning.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren
---
refs/files-backend.c | 31 ---
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git
split_symref_update() receives a string-pointer `referent` and adds it
to the list of `affected_refnames`. The list simply holds on to the
pointers it is given, it does not copy the strings and it never frees
them. The `referent` string in split_symref_update() belongs to a string
buffer in the cal
The code was using two string_lists, one for the directories and
one for the files. The code never checks the lists independently
so we should be able to only use one list. The string_list also
is a O(log n) for lookup and insertion. Switching this to use a
hashmap will give O(1) which will save
The return value of the get_files_dirs call is never being used.
Looking at the history of the file and it was originally only
being used for debug output statements. Also when
read_tree_recursive return value is non zero it is changed to
zero. This leads me to believe that it doesn't matter if
r
Code was using two string_lists, one for the directories and
one for the files. The code never checks the lists independently
so we should be able to only use one list. The string_list also
is a O(log n) for lookup and insertion. Switching this to use a
hashmap will give O(1) which will save som
In merge_trees if process_renames or process_entry returns less
than zero, the method will just return and not free re_merge,
re_head, or entries.
This change cleans up the allocated variables before returning
to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Willford
---
merge-recursive.c | 12 +---
This new binary was introduced in commit 3921a0b ("perf: add test for
writing the index", 2017-08-21), but a .gitignore entry was not added
for it. Add that entry.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
---
t/helper/.gitignore | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/t/helper/.gitignore b/t/help
On 8/3/2017 5:19 AM, Christian Couder wrote:
This describes the external odb mechanism's purpose and
how it works.
Helped-by: Ben Peart
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/technical/external-odb.txt | 295 +++
1 file changed, 295 insertions(+)
c
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Kévin Le Gouguec
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've asked this question on the git-users Google Groups list[1], and
> while the answers there were interesting, I still cannot figure
> whether my problem comes from an actual bug, a misleading manpage, my
> inability to understan
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:52:51AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> >> I'm curious, too. I don't think the valgrind setup in our test suite is
> >> great for finding leaks right now.
>
> This discussion comes up every once in a while,
> the last time I was involved in this discussion I proposed
> to
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 08:44:06PM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote:
> I have lots of git/git branches and once in a while some patches make it
> into git/git master. If this happens I would like to delete my branch
> with the patch automatically. That's not easily possible as the hashes
> on my bran
>>> No mention of "pkt-line.c". Did you run Git with valgrind on one of
>>> your repositories to find it?
>>
>> I'm curious, too. I don't think the valgrind setup in our test suite is
>> great for finding leaks right now.
>
This discussion comes up every once in a while,
the last time I was involv
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Lars Schneider
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have lots of git/git branches and once in a while some patches make it
> into git/git master. If this happens I would like to delete my branch
> with the patch automatically. That's not easily possible as the hashes
> on my branch
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 02:53:34 +, Jeff King wrote:
...
> Whether there's a .bitmap doesn't impact whether .pack and .idx files
> are deleted. The next full repack would pack everything into a new big
> pack, and then delete any existing files, including .pack, .idx, and
> .bitmap.
It took a bit
This aims to make git-submodule 'status' a built-in. Hence, the function
cmd_status() is ported from shell to C. This is done by introducing
three functions: module_status(), submodule_status() and print_status().
The function module_status() acts as the front-end of the subcommand.
It parses subc
Introduce function for_each_listed_submodule() and replace a loop
in module_init() with a call to it.
The new function will also be used in other parts of the
system in later patches.
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Mentored-by: Stefan Beller
Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Chavan
---
builtin/submodu
Introduce function get_submodule_displaypath() to replace the code
occurring in submodule_init() for generating displaypath of the
submodule with a call to it.
This new function will also be used in other parts of the system
in later patches.
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Mentored-by: Stefan Bel
Function set_name_rev() is ported from git-submodule to the
submodule--helper builtin. The function compute_rev_name() generates the
value of the revision name as required.
The function get_rev_name() calls compute_rev_name() and receives the
revision name, and later handles its formating and print
Changes in v4:
* The patches were adjusted to recent codebase.
Also, the gitmodules_config() was call was removed
from the functions module_init() and module_status()
which was essential after the merge of the branch
bw/submodule-config-cleanup.
Since it was mentioned earlier, I even trie
Hello Dear
I am Martins Laurence from Republic of Togo, i contact you for a
private legal business deal worth of $10.5Million i would like you to
contact my private email below for more details
Contact my private email address (martinslaurenc...@gmail.com)
Am expecting your response
Martins Lau
Compliment of the day,
How is your day. I am Mrs. Siti Zakaiah from Malaysia, I am writing to
let know you that,I am a widow and get amount of $5.3M buisness
proposed for you. Please if you are willing and ready, kindly write to
me on this private email id (siti.zakaia...@gmail.com)
Mrs. Siti
Compliment of the day,
How is your day. I am Mrs. Siti Zakaiah from Malaysia, I am writing to
let know you that,I am a widow and get amount of $5.3M buisness
proposed for you. Please if you are willing and ready, kindly write to
me on this private email id (siti.zakaia...@gmail.com)
Mrs. Siti
On 28 August 2017 at 10:06, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Martin Ågren wrote:
>> On 25 August 2017 at 23:00, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Martin Ågren writes:
>>>
files_transaction_prepare() and the functions it calls add strings to a
string list without dup
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Martin Ågren wrote:
> On 25 August 2017 at 23:00, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Martin Ågren writes:
>>
>>> files_transaction_prepare() and the functions it calls add strings to a
>>> string list without duplicating them, i.e., we keep the original raw
>>> pointers w
You could rebase your branches onto the upstream branch.
Once all the patches are in, the SHA1 of the rebased branch is somewhere in the
history of the upstream master.
I use a set of scripts I've written to handle multiple branches:
https://github.com/nmorey/git-topic-branches
Using namesapce i
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Lars Schneider
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have lots of git/git branches and once in a while some patches make it
> into git/git master. If this happens I would like to delete my branch
> with the patch automatically. That's not easily possible as the hashes
> on my branch
32 matches
Mail list logo
