On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>> + * When we are not about to create a repository ourselves (init or
>> + * clone) and when no .git/ directory was set up yet (in which case
>> + * git_config_with_options() would already have picked up the
>> + * repository c
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> This document is still in flux but I thought it best to send it out
> early to start getting feedback.
This actually looks very reasonable if you can implement it cleanly
enough. In many ways the "convert entirely to a new 256-bit hash" i
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 06:13:27PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> brian m. carlson writes ("Re: Transition plan for git to move to a new hash
> function"):
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 01:00:01PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Objects of one hash may refer to objects named by a different hash
> > > f
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:28:36PM -0800, Denton Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hi Denton (or should I address you as Liu?),
> Denton is fine, thanks.
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Denton Liu wrote:
> >
> > > When difftool was rewritten in C, i
On 04/03/2017 20:49, Vegard Nossum wrote:
On 04/03/2017 19:08, Vegard Nossum wrote:
On 04/03/2017 18:23, Lars Schneider wrote:
Did Travis find our first 32bit bug? I briefly looked into it
and the following new topic on pu seems to cause the issue:
http://public-inbox.org/git/20170302172902.16
Torsten Bögershausen writes:
>>> enum safe_crlf crlf_warn = (safe_crlf == SAFE_CRLF_FAIL
>>> ? SAFE_CRLF_WARN
>>> : safe_crlf);
>>> + if (size_only)
>>> + crlf_warn = SAFE_CRLF_FALSE;
>>
>> If you
On 04/03/2017 19:08, Vegard Nossum wrote:
On 04/03/2017 18:23, Lars Schneider wrote:
Did Travis find our first 32bit bug? I briefly looked into it
and the following new topic on pu seems to cause the issue:
http://public-inbox.org/git/20170302172902.16850-1-allan.x.xav...@oracle.com/
https://g
The upload-file command allows a remote to request specific files by sha1.
Signed-off-by: Mark Thomas
---
.gitignore| 1 +
Makefile | 2 ++
daemon.c | 6 +
upload-file.c | 87 +++
4 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
crea
Add the --on-demand option to git-clone, which, when used in combination
with the existing shallow clone options, requests an on-demand shallow
clone.
An on-demand shallow clone contains all commits from all history, but
the commits that would normally be omitted in the shallow clone do not
have t
If an object (tree, blob, ...) is not found either in the
packs or loose, check if it is available on-demand from
the remote.
Signed-off-by: Mark Thomas
---
Makefile| 1 +
cache.h | 3 +-
on_demand.c | 157
on_demand.h |
Hello everyone,
This is an RFC for an enhancement to shallow repositories to make them
behave more like full clones.
I was inspired a bit by Microsoft's announcement of their Git VFS. I
saw that people have talked in the past about making git fetch objects
from remotes as they are needed, and de
Signed-off-by: Mark Thomas
---
builtin/pack-objects.c | 26 --
list-objects.c | 12 +++-
list-objects.h | 13 -
object.h | 1 +
on_demand.c| 26 ++
on_demand.h| 4
uplo
On 04/03/2017 18:23, Lars Schneider wrote:
Did Travis find our first 32bit bug? I briefly looked into it
and the following new topic on pu seems to cause the issue:
http://public-inbox.org/git/20170302172902.16850-1-allan.x.xav...@oracle.com/
https://github.com/git/git/commit/aaae0bf787f09ba102f
> On 04 Mar 2017, at 00:26, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>
> * ls/filter-process-delayed (2017-01-08) 1 commit
> . convert: add "status=delayed" to filter process protocol
>
> Ejected, as does not build when merged to 'pu'.
I send v2 [1] where I tried to address the points in your feedback [2].
v
On 03/04, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/04, Valery Tolstov wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Want to participate in GSoC 2017 with Git.
> > Can I choose "Make 'git tag --contains ' less chatty" as my
> > microproject?
>
> Feel free to choose any microproject from the list. A good way to
> start
> On 04 Mar 2017, at 05:11, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> I only recently started looking at Travis logs, so I cannot tell if
>> it is just a usual flake (e.g. some builds a few days ago seems to
>> have failed due to not being able to ch
On 04/03/17 03:13, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 01:35:04AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
[snip]
>
> The warning itself:
>
>> +warning("alternate disabled by http.followRedirects!=true: %s",
>
> feels like it could use some whitespace around the "!=", but maybe
> that's just
Hi Pranit,
On 03/04/2017 12:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> --
> [Stalled]
[...]
>
> * pb/bisect (2017-02-18) 28 commits
> - fixup! bisect--helper: `bisect_next_check` & bisect_voc shell function in C
> - bisect--helper: remove the dequote in bisec
Looking for microproject ideas for GSoC.
Would this issue be suitable as the microproject?
Thanks,
Valery Tolstov
Hi,
clone or have a repository with submodules.
Now issue "git init --separate-git-dir ../test" which moves the content
of the .git direcotry to the ../test directory and replaces the .git
directory with a .git file "link".
However, for all submodules the .git-file is not updated and still
point
Hi,
On 03/04, Valery Tolstov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Want to participate in GSoC 2017 with Git.
> Can I choose "Make 'git tag --contains ' less chatty" as my microproject?
Feel free to choose any microproject from the list. A good way to
start is to check whether other students already attempted the s
Hi.
Want to participate in GSoC 2017 with Git.
Can I choose "Make 'git tag --contains ' less chatty" as my microproject?
Thanks.
MY name is Mr. ahmed zongo i am working in ADB bank I have
($17.4million Dollars) to transfer to your country and if you are
interested get back to me immediately for more details.and i we give
40% for you and 60% for me ok.
Please note; reply me through this email (zongoahmed...@gmail.com),
cal
On 3/1/2017 18:43, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So, this repo must be knocking several parts of Git's insides. I was curious
about why it was so slow on the writing objects part, since the whole repo
is on a 4x RAID 5, 7k spindels. Now, they are not SSDs sure, but the thing
has ~400MB/s continuous throu
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 08:36:45AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> I also think the security implications for relative alternates
> on the same host would not matter, since the smart HTTP will
> take them into account on the server side.
It depends on the host whether all of the repos on it have the sa
Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 06:55:48AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Jeff King wrote:
> > > The warning itself:
> > >
> > > > + warning("alternate disabled by
> > > > http.followRedirects!=true: %s",
> > >
> > > feels like it could use some whitespace around the "!="
26 matches
Mail list logo
