On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:04:35AM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote:
> diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> index e0efd3c2c3..d872cc1570 100644
> --- a/dir.c
> +++ b/dir.c
> @@ -2773,3 +2773,15 @@ void connect_work_tree_and_git_dir(const char
> *work_tree_, const char *git_dir_)
> free(work_tree);
>
In typical uses of fast-import, trees are inherited from a parent
commit. In that case, the tree_entry for the branch looks like:
.versions[1].sha1 = $some_sha1
.tree =
However, when trees are imported, rather than inherited, that is not the
case. One can import a tree with a filemodify comm
Johannes Sixt writes:
> ..
> The new isatty() override implemented by cbb3f3c9b197 (mingw: intercept
> isatty() to handle /dev/null as Git expects it, 2016-12-11) does not
> take into account that _get_osfhandle() returns the handle visible by
> the C code, which is the pipe. But it actually want
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Kaartic Sivaraam
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have found the "Did you mean this?" feature of git as a very good
> feature. I thought it would be even better if it took a step toward by
> asking for a prompt when there was only one alternative to the command
> that was
>> To reproduce, run 'git submodule' from within a bare repo. Result:
>>
>> $ git submodule
>> fatal: $program_name cannot be used without a working tree.
>>
>> Looks like the intent was for $program_name to be interpolated.
>
> Which version of git do you use?
$ git version
git version 2.11.0
>
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Josh Bleecher Snyder
wrote:
> To reproduce, run 'git submodule' from within a bare repo. Result:
>
> $ git submodule
> fatal: $program_name cannot be used without a working tree.
>
> Looks like the intent was for $program_name to be interpolated.
Which version of
To reproduce, run 'git submodule' from within a bare repo. Result:
$ git submodule
fatal: $program_name cannot be used without a working tree.
Looks like the intent was for $program_name to be interpolated.
As an aside, I sent a message a few days ago about a segfault when
working with a filesy
From: Lars Schneider
The `git lfs track` command generates a .gitattributes file with diff
and merge properties [1]. Set the same .gitattributes format for files
tracked with GitLFS in git-p4.
[1]
https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/blob/v1.5.3/commands/command_track.go#L121
Signed-off-by: Lars
From: Lars Schneider
In a9e38359e3 we taught git-p4 a way to re-encode path names from what
was used in Perforce to UTF-8. This path re-encoding worked properly for
"added" paths. "Removed" paths were not re-encoded and therefore
different from the "added" paths. Consequently, these files were no
Am 18.12.2016 um 16:26 schrieb Johannes Sixt:
> The new isatty() override implemented by cbb3f3c9b197 (mingw: intercept
> isatty() to handle /dev/null as Git expects it, 2016-12-11) does not
> take into account that _get_osfhandle() returns the handle visible by
> the C code, which is the pipe. But
The code in winansi.c emulates ANSI escape sequences when Git is
connected to the "real" windows console, CMD.exe. The details are
outline in eac14f8909d9 (Win32: Thread-safe windows console output,
2012-01-14). Essentially, it plugs a pipe between C code and the actual
console output handle.
This
On 18 December 2016 at 14:18, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have found the "Did you mean this?" feature of git as a very good
> feature. I thought it would be even better if it took a step toward by
> asking for a prompt when there was only one alternative to the command
> that was ent
On Sun, 2016-12-18 at 14:16 +0100, Stephan Beyer wrote:
> I cannot tell if this is a good idea (or why it would be a bad idea)
> but
> why do you restrict your suggestion to the case when there is only
> one
> alternative?
>
> Why not also something like:
>
> ---
> $ git sta
> git: 'sta' is not
Hi,
On 12/18/2016 01:18 PM, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
> I have found the "Did you mean this?" feature of git as a very good
> feature. I thought it would be even better if it took a step toward by
> asking for a prompt when there was only one alternative to the command
> that was entered.
>
> E.g.
> On 13 Dec 2016, at 18:20, Christian Couder wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Lars Schneider
> wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 Nov 2016, at 22:04, Christian Couder
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Goal
>>>
>>>
>>> Git can store its objects only in the form of loose objects in
>>> separate files or p
From: Lars Schneider
t0021.15 creates files, adds them to the index, and commits them. All
this usually happens in a test run within the same second and Git cannot
know if the files have been changed between `add` and `commit`. Thus,
Git has to run the clean filter in both operations. Sometimes
On December 17, 2016 3:56:19 AM PST, Philip Oakley wrote:
>From: "Jacob Keller"
>> From: Jacob Keller
>>
>> Commit c8ba16391655 ("parse-options: add OPT_STRING_LIST helper",
>> 2011-06-09) added the OPT_STRING_LIST as a way to accumulate a
>repeated
>> list of strings. However, this was not docu
Hello all,
I have found the "Did you mean this?" feature of git as a very good
feature. I thought it would be even better if it took a step toward by
asking for a prompt when there was only one alternative to the command
that was entered.
E.g.
> unique@unique-pc:~$ git hepl
> git: 'hepl' is not
18 matches
Mail list logo
