On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
>
>> I wonder if the patch you sent in:
>>
>> https://public-inbox.org/git/20160816144642.5ikkta4l5hyx6...@sigill.intra.peff.net/
>>
>> is still useful or not.
>
> It is potentially
Hello,
I would like to request for implementing feature described in subject.
In several projects, we are using git mergetool for comparing files from
different folders.
Unfortunately, when we have opened three files for comparing using meld tool
(e.q. Old_version -- Result -- New_version),
Am 15.09.2016 um 23:39 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> René Scharfe writes:
>
>> Am 15.09.2016 um 22:01 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>> René Scharfe writes:
>>>
Take this for example:
- strbuf_addf(&o->obuf, _("(bad commit)\n"));
+ strbuf_addstr(&o->ob
Hi Ralf,
many thanks for your translations!
I reviewed them and only have some minor comments:
> #: bisect.c:967
> -#, fuzzy, c-format
> +#, c-format
> msgid "%s was both %s and %s\n"
> -msgstr "%s folgt sowohl %s als auch %s"
> +msgstr "%s war %s als auch %s\n"
Maybe keeping the "sowohl" he
Hi Ravi,
I've reported this one bug recently:
https://public-inbox.org/git/nrmbrl$hsk$1...@blaine.gmane.org/
The developers know about it, but it will require some deeper refactoring.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Anatoly Borodin
Translate 260 new message came from git.pot updates in 9fa976f (l10n:
git.pot: v2.10.0 round 1 (248 new, 56 removed)) and 5bd166d (l10n:
git.pot: v2.10.0 round 2 (12 new, 44 removed)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow
---
po/de.po | 783 ++-
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:38:56AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:07:39AM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/builtin/count-objects.c b/builtin/count-objects.c
> > index ba92919..b2afe36 100644
> > --- a/builtin/count-objects.c
> > +++ b/builtin/count-objects.c
> >
When parse_ref_filter_atom() iterates over a list of valid atoms to
check that a field name is one of them, it has to strip the optional
colon-separated format option suffix that might follow the field name.
However, it does so inside the loop, i.e. it performs the exact same
stripping over and ove
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:07:39AM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> diff --git a/builtin/count-objects.c b/builtin/count-objects.c
> index ba92919..b2afe36 100644
> --- a/builtin/count-objects.c
> +++ b/builtin/count-objects.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ static int count_cruft(const char *basename, const cha
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:07:39AM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> Am 30.09.2016 um 21:36 schrieb Jeff King:
> > We adjust the test script here to demonstrate that this now
> > works. Unfortunately, we can't demonstrate that the
> > duplicate is suppressed, since it has no user-visible
> > behavior (
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> > I've mentioned before on the list that GitHub "quarantines" objects
> > while the pre-receive hook runs. Here are the patches to implement
> > that.
>
> Great! Thanks for ups
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 12:07:27AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> If you need to re-roll your 'jk/quarantine-received-objects' branch,
> could you please squash this into the relevant patches.
Oops, thanks. Don't know how I missed both of these.
> [I also note that tmp_objdir_destroy(), declared t
Given:
1) git version 2.10.0.GIT
2) The following configuration:
===
[core]
pager = less -FRX --tabs=4
[pager]
add = true
===
3) A patch hunk longer than a screen
THEN:
less will be invoked as expected.
However, upon exiting less, I am dropped bac
Dear Sir/Miss
只要贵司拥有一般纳税人资质和能开17%的增值税专用发票,我司便能为贵司做退税;
1.出口退税条件:①真正有生产经营能力的企业而不是空壳企业②需代办出口退税的企业③保证能开增值税专用发票的企业④保证企业开的增值税专用发票的合法,合理而不是虚开增值税专用发票
2.货物出口;工厂须提供产品名称,商品编码,规格,型号,包装方式,单价,总价及装箱单.
3.结汇:①货物出口后两个月内(不能超过两个月)必须进行结汇核销。工厂通知客户(外国)及时结汇,以便我司及时到外汇管理局进行外汇核销工作,否则会影响我司的运作及出口货物的退税工作。②我司收到汇款后按银行当日银行牌价,24小时
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> I've mentioned before on the list that GitHub "quarantines" objects
> while the pre-receive hook runs. Here are the patches to implement
> that.
Great! Thanks for upstreaming these patches!
I wonder if the patch you sent in:
https://public-inb
Am 30.09.2016 um 21:36 schrieb Jeff King:
> We adjust the test script here to demonstrate that this now
> works. Unfortunately, we can't demonstrate that the
> duplicate is suppressed, since it has no user-visible
> behavior (it's just one less place for our object lookups to
> go). But you can ver
16 matches
Mail list logo