On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 07:03:19AM +0100, Fredrik Medley wrote:
> On Windows, when Git is installed under "C:\Program Files\Git", SHELL_PATH
> will include a space. Fix "git rebase --interactive --exec" so that it
> works with spaces in SHELL_PATH.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fredrik Medley
> ---
> git-
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:39:20PM +0100, Clemens Buchacher wrote:
> Since ec7dbd145 (receive-pack: allow hooks to ignore its standard input
> stream) the pre-receive and post-receive hooks ignore SIGPIPE. Do the
> same for the remaining hooks pre-push and post-rewrite, which read from
> standard
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:42:22PM +0100, Clemens Buchacher wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:39:20PM +0100, Clemens Buchacher wrote:
> > + if (write_in_full(proc.in, buf.buf, buf.len) < 0) {
> > + /* We do not mind if a hook does not read all refs. */
> > +
On Windows, when Git is installed under "C:\Program Files\Git", SHELL_PATH
will include a space. Fix "git rebase --interactive --exec" so that it
works with spaces in SHELL_PATH.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Medley
---
git-rebase--interactive.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
d
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 04:41:06PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> I know we've discussed this particular spot before, and I think there
> may have been some disagreement about which style was the best. But
> since clearly no patch came out of the last discussion, and since
> an inconsistent set of styl
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:55:53AM +, Kannan Goundan wrote:
> For our workflow, author dates aren't very useful. I'm looking for a way to
> configure Git so that "git log" shows commit dates instead of author dates.
> "--pretty=fuller" gets me almost what I want, but I'd like to avoid the
>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:37:41AM +0100, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Lars Schneider
>
> "git clone --recursive --depth 1 --single-branch " clones the
> submodules successfully. However, it does not obey "--depth 1" for
> submodule cloning.
>
> The following workaround does only wor
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:02:10PM +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> A user recently asked an interesting question on the git-users list.
> I think it warrants attentions of a specialists more hard-core than
> we're there over at git-users.
>
> So I'd like to solicit help if those knowledgeabl
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:32:29PM -0600, David Greene wrote:
> Sending again with a proper From: address after rebasing on latest master.
>
> Copying the maintainers because the origin patchset didn't get any
> comments and I'm unsure of how to proceed.
That's because Junio is on vacation and I
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:36:16PM -0600, David A. Greene wrote:
> > + sub="$(git rev-parse "$b^0")" || die "could not
> > rev-parse split hash $b from commit $sq"
>
> This seems like odd quoting. Would not this do the same?
>
> sub="$(gi
Rob Mayoff writes:
> diff --git a/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh b/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh
> index 9f06571..b051600 100755
> --- a/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh
> +++ b/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh
> @@ -245,7 +245,10 @@ find_latest_squash()
> case "$a" in
>
From: Rob Mayoff
If a subtree was added using a tag ref, the tag ref is stored in
the subtree commit message instead of the underlying commit's ref.
To split or push subsequent changes to the subtree, the subtree
command needs to unwrap the tag ref. This patch makes it do so.
The problem was de
From: Techlive Zheng
Each test runs a full repository creation and any subtree actions
needed to perform the test. Each test starts with a clean slate,
making debugging and post-mortem analysis much easier.
Signed-off-by: Techlive Zheng
Signed-off-by: David A. Greene
---
contrib/subtree/t/t7
From: Techlive Zheng
'git subtree merge' will fail if the argument of '--prefix' has a slash
appended.
Signed-off-by: Techlive Zheng
Signed-off-by: David A. Greene
---
contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh | 2 +-
contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh | 20
2 files changed, 21
Sending again with a proper From: address after rebasing on latest master.
Copying the maintainers because the origin patchset didn't get any
comments and I'm unsure of how to proceed.
These are some old changes I have lying around that should get applied
to clean up git-subtree's testbase. With
From: Techlive Zheng
Add tests to check various options to split. Check combinations of
--prefix, --message, --annotate, --branch and --rejoin.
Signed-off-by: Techlive Zheng
Signed-off-by: David A. Greene
---
contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh | 17 +++--
1 file changed, 15 inser
From: Techlive Zheng
Add some tests for various merge operations. Test combinations of merge
with --message, --prefix and --squash.
Signed-off-by: Techlive Zheng
Signed-off-by: David A. Greene
---
contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 dele
From: Techlive Zheng
Add some tests to check various options to subtree add. These test
various combinations of --message, --prefix and --squash.
Signed-off-by: Techlive Zheng
Signed-off-by: David A. Greene
---
contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 i
From: Techlive Zheng
Mostly prepare for the later tests refactoring. This moves some
common code to helper functions and generally cleans things up to be
more presentable.
Signed-off-by: Techlive Zheng
Signed-off-by: David A. Greene
---
contrib/subtree/t/Makefile | 31 ---
c
From: Techlive Zheng
Test that a merge from a non-existant subtree fails.
Signed-off-by: Techlive Zheng
Signed-off-by: David A. Greene
---
contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh
b/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-s
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Christian Couder
>> wrote:
>>> A draft of Git Rev News edition 8 is available here:
>>> https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_new
+cc Stanislav, who came up with the other thread for passing --remote
to git submodule
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Lars Schneider
wrote:
>> Notice the other email thread, which suggests to include --remote into the
>> call to git submodule update depending on a branch config option being
>>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:37 AM, wrote:
> From: Lars Schneider
>
> "git clone --recursive --depth 1 --single-branch " clones the
> submodules successfully. However, it does not obey "--depth 1" for
> submodule cloning.
>
> The following workaround does only work if the used submodule pointer
> i
Torsten Bögershausen writes:
> So whenever a long long is printed, I can warmly recommend to use
>
> PRId64
PRId64 is not suitable for long long, only for int64_t.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And n
Hi Git people
This popup saying that "No difference has been detected" is little bit
boring and useless since it states that an automatic resync will be
started and there is no way to stop the resync.
Can GitGui remove this popup?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
On 12/11/15 05:27, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>>Ah. OK, so %ld for long and %lld for long long, I suppose.
> Only if you have a system that's support it.
>
> Linux does, Windows not.
Sure, but I was speculating specifically about Eric's mac (which I
have no experience with).
>
>> Hmm, not th
Hello,
`git stash create` does not accepts the same options that `git stash
save` accepts.
It would be handy to have `git stash create` accept
`-u`/`--include-untracked` and `-a`/`--all`. This would allow a very
simple "freeze-the-world-I-have-to-leave emergency backup" command such as
A user recently asked an interesting question on the git-users list.
I think it warrants attentions of a specialists more hard-core than
we're there over at git-users.
So I'd like to solicit help if those knowledgeable, if possible.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:30:40 -0800
On 11 Nov 2015, at 21:09, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Lars Schneider
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a clean build machine and I want to clone my source code to this
>>> machine while transferring only the
From: Lars Schneider
"git clone --recursive --depth 1 --single-branch " clones the
submodules successfully. However, it does not obey "--depth 1" for
submodule cloning.
The following workaround does only work if the used submodule pointer
is on the default branch. Otherwise "git submodule update
From: Lars Schneider
"git clone --recursive --depth 1 --single-branch " clones the
submodules successfully. However, it does not obey "--depth 1" for
submodule cloning.
The following workaround does only work if the used submodule pointer
is on the default branch. Otherwise "git submodule update
31 matches
Mail list logo
