Hm, being one day offline and there are lots of ideas and
new patches, I like that.
I run these test under msys and cygwin on latest pu (a3dc223ff234481356c):
./t0001-init.sh
./t0004-unwritable.sh
./t0061-run-command.sh
./t0070-fundamental.sh
./t1004-read-tree-m-u-wf.sh
./t1300-repo-config.sh
./t
Instead of manually eyeballing style in reviews, just ask all
contributors to run their patches through [git-]clang-format.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra
---
The idea is to introduce the community to this new toy I found called
clang-format. Whether or not it's actually going to be used d
The clone subcommand has long had support for excluding
subdirectories, but sync has not. This is a nuisance,
since as soon as you do a sync, any changed files that
were initially excluded start showing up.
Move the "exclude" command-line option into the parent
class; the actual behavior was alrea
The git-p4 'clone' subcommand has long had the option to specify
parts of the repo to be excluded, on the command line. But this has
not been present in 'sync', which makes it less than useful: as
soon as you do a sync, the excluded parts start being repopulated
as those directories are changed.
(
Am 16. Januar 2015 um 23:31 schrieb phillip :
>
> looks good!
>
Thanks for review!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This patch adds support -n/--dry-run option for branch(es) deletion.
If -n/--dry-run option passed to git branch -d branch..., branch(es)
will not be removed, instead just print list of branches that are
to be removed.
For example:
$ git branch
a
b
c
* master
$ git branch
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov
---
Documentation/git-branch.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-branch.txt b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
index 311b336..722f865 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-branch.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
@@
Hi,
I am asking myself if git and .gitattributes should be more stateless?
i.e.
whatever you have done before is irrelevant, when you reach status XYZ
with your
git repo, it is EXACTLY and BINARY the same all the time and
everywhere.
It took some time for me to figure out, that depending on
From: "Alexander Kuleshov"
This patch adds support -d/--dry-run option for branch(es) deletion.
If -d/--dry-run option passed to git branch -d branch..., branch(es)
surely s|-d/--dry-run|-n/--dry-run|
-n is the short version of --dryrun. -d is already in use.
will not be removed, instead jus
The man for `--delete` says only refs on the remote repo are affected.
Then, the auto-completion in zsh shall not return local refs.
```
$ git branch -a
master
* tmp
remotes/origin/master
remotes/origin/tmp
$ git push origin --delete
FETCH_HEAD HEAD master ORIG_HEAD
o
Hi,
I am asking myself if git and .gitattributes should be more stateless? i.e.
whatever you have done before is irrelevant, when you reach status XYZ with your
git repo, it is EXACTLY and BINARY the same all the time and everywhere.
It took some time for me to figure out, that depending on HOW y
s/short/long/
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kern
12 matches
Mail list logo