I'm hoping to get the following feature implemented into git.
Add the ability to recursively include using:
!/my_dir/**/*
Currently, in order to include a directory with multiple sub-directories
within a excluded directory, you must do the following:
!/my_dir/
!/my_dir/*
!/my_dir/*/*
!/my_dir/*/*
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Stefan Saasen wrote:
> DiffMerge is a non-free (but gratis) tool that supports OS X, Windows and
> Linux.
>
> See http://www.sourcegear.com/diffmerge/
>
> DiffMerge includes a script `/usr/bin/diffmerge` that can be used to launch
> the
> graphical compare too
Sparse issues an "using sizeof on a function" warning for each
call to curl_easy_setopt() which sets an option that takes a
function pointer parameter. (currently 12 such warnings over 4
files.)
The warnings relate to the use of the "typecheck-gcc.h" header
file which adds a layer of type-checkin
Linux Mint has an implementation of the highlight command (unrelated
to the one from http://www.andre-simon.de) that works as a simple
filter. The script uses 'sed' to add terminal colour escape codes
around text matching a regular expression. When t9500-*.sh attempts
to run "highlight --version",
The Thunderbird section of the 'MUA-specific hints' contains three
different approaches to setting up the mail client to leave patch
emails unmolested. The second approach (configuration) has a step
missing when configuring the composition window not to wrap. In
particular, the "mailnews.wraplengt
When the NO_MKSTEMPS build variable is not set, sparse issues an
"'gitmkstemps' was not declared. Should it be static?" warning.
The 'gitmkstemps' function definition is only required when the
NO_MKSTEMPS variable is set. In order to suppress the warning,
use a preprocessor conditional to include
Sparse issues an "Using plain integer as NULL pointer" warning
against a call to update_ref_lock() which passes '0' to the
'int *type_p' parameter. In order to suppress the warning, we
simply change the argument to 'NULL'.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
---
refs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 inserti
Sparse issues an "'git_parse_unsigned' was not declared. Should it
be static?" warning. In order to suppress this warning, since this
symbol only requires file scope, we simply add the static modifier
to its declaration.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
---
config.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 inserti
Hi Jonathan,
These patches don't have too much in common, hence the subject
line, except perhaps that 4 of them fix sparse warnings.
Note that the fourth patch is actually a simplified version of
an earlier RFC patch. Junio didn't like the idea of using a
build variable (GIT_TEST_HIGHLIGHT_BIN)
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 05:38:24PM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, brian m. carlson wrote:
>
> >If there's a way to make Apache with mod_auth_kerb do that with
> >curl, then it doesn't require a change to git, and I'm happy to
> >make it on my end. But using the curl command li
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, brian m. carlson wrote:
If there's a way to make Apache with mod_auth_kerb do that with curl, then
it doesn't require a change to git, and I'm happy to make it on my end.
But using the curl command line client, I don't see an Expect: 100-continue
anywhere during the connect
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 05:00:02PM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
>
> >>GSS-Negotiate authentication always requires a rewind with CURL.
>
> >Isn't 'Expect: 100-Continue' meant for stuff like this (not that
> >it is always supported properly)?
>
> Yes
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
GSS-Negotiate authentication always requires a rewind with CURL.
Isn't 'Expect: 100-Continue' meant for stuff like this (not that it is
always supported properly)?
Yes it is and libcurl uses 100-Continue by default for that purpose. But the
harsh
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Johan Herland"
>> Cc: Eric Wong
>
> Excuse my ignorance, but what is the "Carbon copy:" line meant to signify?
> Should it be a double "Signed-of-by:" or one of the other "-by:" lines?
No, it's not a Signed-off-by, it's merely a hin
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:42:36AM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
>
> GSS-Negotiate authentication always requires a rewind with CURL.
>
> The remote in question only supports Negotiate authentication, so
> prompting for a password in this case isn't going to help. I'm probably
> going to look i
From: "Johan Herland"
Currently, the git-svn defaults to using an empty prefix, which ends
up placing the SVN-tracking refs directly in refs/remotes/*. This
placement runs counter to Git's convention of placing remote-tracking
branches in refs/remotes/$remote/*.
This is also in preparation f
On 10/05/2013 01:55 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Stefan Beller
> wrote:
>> I think we should emit a warning additionally?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
>
> I think it's nice to credit Robert for reporting the fault in the
> commit message (something like "reported
17 matches
Mail list logo