As some of you seem to have noticed even before the announcement
by Linus, the official GIT repository at kernel.org is now owned
by me. As Linus said in his message, this does not mean he is
leaving us, so please do not panic.
I would like to thank everybody on the GIT list for what we have
achi
I'm sure some of you eagle-eyes have already noticed this, but for the
last 24 hours the "owner" field on the main git project at www.kernel.org
hasn't been pointing to yours truly any more. It says "Junio C Hamano"
instead.
The description may still say "Linus' core git plumbing", but I think
Ahh, the cobite.com address worked ;)
David, as you may or may not be aware, the dm.cobite.com address was
bouncing at least as of yesterday.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, David Mansfield wrote:
>
> It 'smells' wierd to have to revisions in the same patchset at all, but
> I suppose you've all been thro
Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:57:43 -0700 (PDT),
> Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>>I'm planning on doing the 2.4 tree too some day - either as a separate
>>branch in the same archive, or as a separate git archive, I haven't quite
>
> It'd be great to have the sam
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
And they are in the wrong order, so "cvsimport" ends up committing the
last one, which is the _empty_ one.
Notice? We'll end up committing "COPYING 1.1" (the empty initial create)
even though we _should_ have committed "COPYING
El Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:57:43 -0700 (PDT),
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I'm planning on doing the 2.4 tree too some day - either as a separate
> branch in the same archive, or as a separate git archive, I haven't quite
It'd be great to have the same thing but for the 1.0 - 2.2 t
Ok, I'm uploading my current git CVS import results to kernel.org right
now, which is my current best effort (meaning: I may try to improve on it
even if there aren't any more cvsps bugs/features I have to fix, and
obviously I'll re-create it if there _are_ cvsps or cvsimport bugs that
cause the i
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm.. David Mansfields address is bouncing, and it's apparently not just
> that "cvsps" thing, since it says that the MX machine can't be looked up.
> Does anybody have an alternate address for him? All the ones I've seen so
> far with google are at the same failing "dm.c
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > Put another way: do you argue that X network transparency is a total waste
> > of time? You could certainly optimize X if you always made it be
> > local-machine only. Or you could make tons of special cases, and have X
> > have separate code-path
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> David, how about a patch like this to cvsps? My very very limited testing
> seems to say that it does the right thing..
Hmm.. David Mansfields address is bouncing, and it's apparently not just
that "cvsps" thing, since it says that the MX machine
Junio C Hamano wrote:
>Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>I hope you're the right contact person for this. Could you please update
>>the documentation on http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/ .
>>It is a bit outdated. I just wanted to send a co-worker a link to the
>
Make git-rename-script behave much better when faced with input contain Perl
regular expression metacharacters.
Also, restore support for the GIT_DIR
Signed-off-by: Ryan Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
git-rename-script | 26 --
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 d
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:30:36AM -0400, Ryan Anderson wrote:
>
> A short message requesting a pull from the repository is also included.
And, an example (which has a correct version of my fixes to
git-rename-script included in it.)
To generate this I used:
git request-pull origin x rsy
A short message requesting a pull from the repository is also included.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Makefile|3 ++-
git-request-pull-script | 36
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 10
14 matches
Mail list logo
