On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 00:19 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:15:37PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 11:26 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >> > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:41:12AM CE
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Actually, the subdirectory hack has the same effect, so you lose
regardless. Doesn't mean that you can't construct cases where the
subdirectory hack doesn't win, but I maintain that those are likely to
be artificial.
That should, of course, be "... where the subdirectory
Christopher Li wrote:
But if you write a large number of random files, when htree has three
levels index. htree will suffer on the effect that it dirty random block
very quickly, most block get dirty only contain one or two new entries.
Ext3 will choke on it due to the limited journal size.
While n
> Oh, my bad. I am not trying to start a language war here.
Neither am I - no problem what so ever.
Besides, I think we'd be on the same side.
My point was only a gentle one -- as is often the case when dealing with
the strange species called human, whether or not you can get away with
somethin
4 matches
Mail list logo
