Hi all,
When trying to build gimp-2.3.3 - I just want to try the new SIOX based
selection
tool - I met the following compile problem:
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o .libs/faxg3 faxg3.o g3.o run_tbl.o ../../libgimp/.libs/libgimp-2.0.so
../../libgimpcolor/.libs/libgimpcolor-2.0.so ../../libgimpbase/.libs/
Hi all,
For those of you who have installed the imagemagick package,
try:
import -window root root.`date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S`.png
for the whole screen. Bind it to a key with your favourite
window manager or the xbindkeys utility.
Kind regards,
Stephan.
_
Sven Neumann wrote:
>> When trying to build gimp-2.3.3 - I just want to try the new SIOX
>> based selection tool - I met the following compile problem:
>>
>> gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o .libs/faxg3 faxg3.o g3.o run_tbl.o
>> ../../libgimp/.libs/libgimp-2.0.so
>> ../../libgimpcolor/.libs/libgimpcolor-2.0.
Hi all,
Recently I had to deal with a couple of images with signifcant
vignetting in the corners: they were a few % darker. So, I was
looking around for an adjustable anti-vignetting filter for Gimp,
similar like that one for "digikam". Any idea ?
Kind regards,
Stephan.
__
Hi all,
If vignetting is perfectly radial, panotools is easy to setup and use.
Bruno's tip with the gradient layer can fix even more difficult problems,
e.g. when too dark areas aren't radial. Needs a bit more effort, though.
Sven's idea sounds interesting but I haven't tried yet. I will keep thi
Hi all,
I've installed gimp-2.3.4 right now and met another problem: all pull-down
and pop-up menus do have a black background. Black fonts on black background
is hard to read, I'm sure.
Within the terminal a few message like this pop up:
(gimp:23382): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_back_pixmap
Carol Spears wrote:
http://www.gimp.org/tutorials/Basic_Batch/
No, this is not _the_ way for this simple task. The approaches with
the ImageMagick tools are much more simple and easier to handle.
And: ImageMagick is part of many Linux distributions.
So, really no need to dig into Script-Fu for
Hi,
There is a package called "batchgimp" on freshmeat. Basically it
includes Perl scripts with embedded Script-Fu. I modified and
used it once to convert a bunch of images to the Gimp pattern
format (which cannot be done by Imagemagick, unfortunately).
Another choice could be David's Batch Proc
s ver wrote:
Digital photos taken from microfilm equipment in public libraries
typically come up with inequality in brightness due to imperfect
condenser lenses. Gives a bright center and dark corners. (sample at
http://users.telenet.be/spica/trial/microfilm.jpg).
Has anyone a filter to correc
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
I was referring to the Michael's sentence about "Bugzilla for threads
concerning GIMPShop". I am trying to find such threads in Bugzilla, but
I can't.
You haven't tried, have you ? Point your browser to bugzilla.gnome.org
and search for gimpshop. Voila: 309707.
Regards,
Does ImageMagick support the xcf file format ?
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Adly Mabro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-07-06 22:48]:
Does anyone know how I can convert a batch of .xcf files to .jpg?
Use ImageMagick, put all in one directory and:
for i in *.xcf; do convert $i `basename $i jpg`; done
Hi,
As Sven mentioned there a couple of those scripts on the web: shell
scripts with embedded script-fu, pure script-fu, etc. Which one are
you using ?
If you use that one posted to
http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/Gimp-Xcf-Image-Viewer-2399-1.html
near the bottom of the page it should be
Hi all,
I've seen this once and IIRC it turned out that my gimp-2.3 tried to load
libgimp / libgimpbase from version 2.2 which is still on the somewhere on
my Linux box.
I fixed this by installing gimp-2.3 completely under /usr/local/Gimp-2.3
and calling it by a little wrapper named gimpdev:
---
ael Schumacher wrote:
> Stephan Hegel wrote:
>
>> I fixed this by installing gimp-2.3 completely under /usr/local/Gimp-2.3
>> and calling it by a little wrapper named gimpdev:
>
> The release notes suggest to use /opt/gimp-2.3, BTW.
>
>
> HTH,
> Michael
>
__
Michael Schumacher wrote:
> You mean a GIMP 2.3 build with --prefix=/opt/gimp-2.3 still exhibits the
> same error on Slackware? Maybe this is something a Slackware user should
> investigate then.
Even on my SuSE 10.0, this would cause the same problem as LD_LIBRARY_PATH
does not point to "/opt/gimp
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Not if you use the wrapper script that is suggested by the release notes
> and has already been mentioned here.
Yes, I've posted a little wrapper by myself - you haven't read the whole
thread carefully, have you ?
Honestly: who is reading release notes ? This assumption is si
Brendan wrote:
> I have to respectfully disagree here.
> When something is being "released" and it's not even production, then yes,
> you
> should read them. In reading them, you would discover the wrapper script. I
> know because this is how I discovered it, and I am not a Gimp devel, just a
>
Sven Neumann wrote:
> You are making a wrong assumption here about the target audience of a
> source release. Users are not the target audience. Users should grab a
> pre-compiled binary from their distributor or from someone who knows
> what he's doing and provides one for them.
I consider myself
Tom Williams wrote:
> For the record folks, I've got Gimp 2.2.11 installed in /usr (came with
> my Linux distro) and Gimp 2.3.12 (used to have 2.3.11) installed in
> /usr/local/gimp-2.3 and I'm able to run either version without any
> problems, errors, or wrapper scripts (unless gimp-2.3 is a wrap
Saul Goode wrote:
> They don't necessarily *need* the wrapper (that is but one suggested
> solution to having multiple GIMPs installed concurrently)
If you have another suggestion how to run multiple, library-wise
incompatible instances of Gimp without using a wrappers, please
let me know.
Kind re
Tom Williams wrote:
> Sure can. :)
>
> START-
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Thanks, Tom. The point is the empty LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable.
IIUC, in this case the loader is not forced to search for libs in
certain directories. Seems i
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Why don't you just pass --enable-binreloc to configure and simply call
> the resulting binary directly? It will then figure out where to find the
> libraries and data files relative to the location of the binary.
Thanks for this hint. Meanwhile I've solved the problem as desc
Hi Raeth,
May I ask what Ink tool settings you have used to achieve such smooth
lines ?
Thanks & kind regards,
Stephan.
Raeth wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> When painting beneath lineart, I typically use the paintbrush tool set
> to a 100% hard brush and size variation. In GIMP I found the
> Pain
Hi all,
How can I edit an image comment in The Gimp ?
I can display it in the Info window but haven't found a way
to edit it. Even not in the last user manual ...
Thanks & kind regards,
Stephan.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkel
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Scott Bicknell wrote:
> I don't know of a way to edit an existing image's comment,
> however. There appears to be no way to do that. But I may have
> overlooked something that someone else here can point out.
This is exactly what I'm looking for.
Meanwhile
Hi there,
I've tried Gimp 2.3.15 with the following script:
http://turtle.as.arizona.edu/jdsmith/exposure-blend.scm
When launching Gimp I get the following error:
script-fu-Warning: Error while executing
(load "/home/steve/.gimp-2.3/scripts/exposure-blend.scm")
Error: set!: unbound variable:
Hello Sven,
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Since you are using the development version, you should be subscribed to
> the gimp-developer mailing-list. We haven't written a decent document
> describing the changes in Script-Fu yet, but you can read about them in
> the mailing-list archives.
Thanks for the p
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Scott wrote:
> Question: how do I apply a grey or neutral filter with a vertical gradient to
> the photograph? And how can this gradient be adjusted to suit? I checked the
> web site and documentation, but my time-limited search did not come up with
> anything.
Might be this is h
Hi John,
John R. Culleton wrote:
> I cannot find the sources for dcraw, only Mac and Wndoze binaries. I
> use Linux.
>
> Hints?
http://cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw
Search for dcraw.c - it is only this file.
Regards,
Stephan.
___
Gimp-user mailin
Hi Luigi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, I'm running Linux but have **no** experience with ImageMagick.
> I'll try and follow your hint.
This web page might be useful for a quick start:
http://hoernle1.de/m/imagick6/
Stephan.
___
Gimp-user mail
Victor Domingos wrote:
> Is it possible to support the Mac platform, too? That would be really
> cool... :)
http://www.gimp.org/macintosh
Rgds,
Stephan.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailm
Hi,
ASJF wrote:
> (I have also tried to open it with my favourite emacs... but it contains
> only "@@@").
If it contains only "@"s, what are you going to recover ?
Rgds,
Stephan.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.ED
Hi,
Robert Lindsey wrote:
> Hello, I just downloaded GIMP to a Windows XP computer. I have over 100
> images that I would like to put a text layer on to label them before I
> upload them to a website. Is there a way to batch process this?
I suggest to use Imagemagick for this. See:
http://h
John R. Culleton wrote:
> And has anybody used a Wacom tablet with Gimp and Linux?
I've used an older Intuos tablet, model GD-0608-R, serial interface
with Gimp 2.2.
Regards,
Stephan.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
htt
Johan Vromans wrote:
> Is that also true for the older (serial) versions? If so, how to
> enable this?
Olivier provided you already a pointer to the Linux wacom project.
It deals with serial tablets as well and everything is explained
in detail there. Even an extra section is spend on how to enable
Hi Rolf,
First, thanks for the nice and educational video tutorials. After watching #1
to #3 I've re-configured The Gimp on my box ... representing now a similar
layout like your's with just one toolbox window open including tabs for other
dialogs like layers, channels, etc. in the lower pane. Nea
David Woodfall wrote:
> I have just downloaded and tested two scripts and get the same error with
> each:
>
> Error: Set!: Unbound variable: new
>
> The scripts are gm-invert and gm-solarize. Is there some incompatability
> with newer versions of Gimp and these scripts? Is there an easy way to
>
Hi all,
I remember that I had to configure Gtk+ and Gimp with the option
--with-xinput=xfree when I want to use a Wacom tablet in Gimp on
a Linux box.
Is this still true ? I can't find this option anymore when running
./configure --help.
Regards,
Stephan.
__
Hi all,
Thanks to David and Sven for the quick reply.
David Gowers wrote:
> GIMP has never had that configure option. You need to pass
> --with-xinput=yes to GTK+ to enable XInput support; where you got
> 'xfree' from baffles me.
>From the Linux Wacom Project HOWTO at
http://linuxwacom.source
Hi,
I've got the following problem with a self-compiled Gimp 2.4.1 on an
openSuse 10.3 box (x86_64) when doing a simple "File->New" with no
image open before:
[prompt]/home/steve: gimp
*** glibc detected *** gimp: double free or corruption (out):
0x037f2e40 ***
Killed
Glib2 and Gtk2 and
e the defaults (incl. python), except that
I've chosen another --prefix.
Kind regards,
Stephan.
Alex wrote:
> glib2-2.14.1-4
> gtk2-2.12.0-5.2
> (to complete the set:)
> glibc-2.6.1-18.3
> gcc-4.2-24
> kernel-default-2.6.22.9-0.4
>
>
> --- Stephan Hegel <[EMA
Hi all,
I've a file here which is identified as an tiff image by Imagemagick's
identify, opens perfectly without any warning in xv, gqview and
cinepaint but when I try to open it in Gimp the Ufraw plugin is launched.
What could Gimp make thinking that this is a raw image file ... any
idea ? Suspi
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies, especially Sven's explanation and the pointer
to pluginrc.
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Certainly nothing with Exif. My guess is that the Ufraw plug-in claims
> responsibility for this file. Most probably the magic header that the
> ufraw loader registers matches for this
43 matches
Mail list logo
