Ryan Coyner wrote:
Hey guys. I'm having some problems with layers, and if any of you can
help me find a solution, I'd appreciate it.
When I quit (after saving) the gimp while working a project with
multiple layers, all the layers seem to merge into one called
"Background" when I open it up again. I
Owen Cook wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Asif Lodhi wrote:
OK, go to your gimp-2.2.6 directory
type ./configure --help and have a read, even it it means little
You will see how to install in another prefix, example
./configure --prefix=/opt will configure so that it is built in /opt
I've be
Owen Cook wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Barton Bosch wrote:
So, two main questions: 1) is there a way to compile atk and
fontconfig in parallel to the already installed rpms (as the gimp
2.2.6 was) and then pass a configure option or edit a script to have
gimp use the new versions?; and, 2
David Adam wrote:
Greetings, helpful people!
I need to add annotation to images, but cannot figure out what to do
to change the font size. The documentation clearly states that this is
easy to do, but I have been unable to find out how to do it under Gimp 2.2.
In particular, Tools -> Text and Di
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 22:18, Rikard Johnels wrote:
Hello all!
Is there a fast way to view all patterns a bit bigger then the
iconic view in the selection tools?
I would like to have a palette to view ca. 200x200 pixels big.
It would make it easier for me to choose
This might be slightly OT, my apologies if it causes any
inconvenience. I just got some new fonts and am not quite sure
how/if I can use some of them.
The TTF fonts are familiar; I just put them into my font directory.
There are also a few .AFM (Adobe?) fonts. I found other .afm
files on
I am running a Red Hat 9.0 system that currently has GIMP 1.2.3
installed on it. I'd like to check out 2.0 and have been trying
to figure out how to get it together. I haven't compiled much
large, involved software yet so I am running into some
fundamental questions.
First it looks like I ne
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Barton Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am running a Red Hat 9.0 system that currently has GIMP 1.2.3
installed on it. I'd like to check out 2.0 and have been trying to
figure out how to get it together. I haven't compiled much large,
involved soft
Thanks to the link to the Red Hat 9.0 RPMs (kudos to xach) I've
gotten my system updated far enough to attempt to compile gimp
2.0.1 from source. I've compiled and installed many of the
optional packages as well.
I am running into a couple of warning messages though, re:
gtkhtml2 and the html
Owen wrote:
On Mon, 03 May 2004 16:52:52 -0700
Barton Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
checking for aa_printf in -laa... no
configure: WARNING: *** AA plug-in will not be built (AA library
not found) ***
...
checking for libgtkhtml-2.0 >= 2.0.0... Package libgtkhtml-2.0
was not found i
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Barton Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I do have another question, re: the Perl plugin though. When
trying to compile it it says that it can't find gimp when it
tries to run the test program:
checking for GIMP - version >= 2.0.0... no
*** Could not
John Dietsch wrote:
Greg, For Fedora, you need to learn to use yum. If you installed FC
from an RPM, it should already be there. Check in /etc for yum.conf . If
it's not there, go to the source where you got the Fedora RPM and install
yum. For the new Gimp you need to be in Fedora Core 2.
John Dietsch wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Barton Bosch wrote:
Should I take it that installing the new GIMP on FC1 is not
significantly easier than on rh 9 (shrike)?
It is the same.
What are people's experiences re: GIMP 2.x and FC1? Is it the
same nightmare of rebuilding gtk2? Or
Michael Schumacher wrote:
I have only done a bit of checking into the newer distros, but isn't
FC2 a 64 bit OS? That would make it incompatible with my PIII 550,
correct?
Don't start spreading FUD. From http://fedora.redhat.com
Sorry, no FUD intended. The info I got:
CPU Requirements
This sec
While we're on the topic of scaling/resampling maybe someone could
clarify something for me. I read somewhere that when scaling an
image for display on a monitor that it was best to change the dpi by
the same ratio to avoid interpolation. Elsewhere I have gotten the
impression that dpi was to
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Barton Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
While we're on the topic of scaling/resampling maybe someone could
clarify something for me. I read somewhere that when scaling an image
for display on a monitor that it was best to change the dpi by the
same rat
I have some 1200 dpi scans that need to be scaled down, sharpened
with unsharp mask and then saved as jpgs at ~50% quality setting.
Should the operations be performed in the order above or would it be
better to scale->save as 50% qual jpg->unsharp mask->save as 100%
qual jpg?
Thanks,
Barton
__
Carol Spears wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 02:07:43PM -0700, Barton Bosch wrote:
I have some 1200 dpi scans that need to be scaled down, sharpened
with unsharp mask and then saved as jpgs at ~50% quality setting.
i am curious for the reason for saving at the 50% quality setting.
fiddling with
What are the best ways to take an image of a straight line and bend
it into an s-curve with The GIMP? I have tried the perspective and
shear tools as well as the distort->curve bend filter without
producing an ideal result.
Are there other options? I'd like to be able to set some points and
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 06:44, Carol Spears wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 03:44:52PM -0800, Barton Bosch wrote:
What are the best ways to take an image of a straight line and
bend it into an s-curve with The GIMP? I have tried the
perspective and shear
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Barton Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Huh, I tried the Iwarp filter but it seems to be broken (GIMP 2.0.4
from the FC2 rpm).
It showed the layer in the preview window but regardless of any
changes in parameters it didn't alter the image at all. Did I miss
so
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Barton Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You're probably way ahead of me on this but wouldn't a larger preview
window and an expanded UI (e.g., like the path tool) be great with
Iwarp? Maybe implementing it as a tool rather than a filter would be
in orde
22 matches
Mail list logo
