I am new to writing plugins - am I violating some convention by putting my
plugin in Tools/Color Tools? It seems the best category from the point of
view of fit, but perhaps I should use Script-Fu/Color Tools/ instead? I
don't like the "enhance" category, as it seems to be very ill-defined (wel
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 23:25 -0800, Luca de Alfaro wrote:
> This is strange - I defined it so that it goes under "Tools/Color
> Tools" for version 1.2 (It used to be Layer/Colors). That's where all
> the other color manipulation options are... (The script-fu menu seems
> to be on things other
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 18:23 -0800, Anthony Ettinger wrote:
> Is it possible to group layers in Gimp?
>
> One problem is linking them, would be nice to link groups and move
> them independently of each other.
Before asking here, you could run a query on our bug-tracker:
http://bugzilla.gnom
On 12/13/06, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 18:23 -0800, Anthony Ettinger wrote:
> > Is it possible to group layers in Gimp?
> >
> > One problem is linking them, would be nice to link groups and move
> > them independently of each other.
>
> Before asking he
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 00:19 -0800, Anthony Ettinger wrote:
> No offense Sven, but this *is* the gimp-user list.
Sorry, but are you trying to say that users are not able to do some
research before asking?
> That's the second time I've asked a simple gimp question in the last 2
> weeks where
On 12/13/06, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 00:19 -0800, Anthony Ettinger wrote:
>
> > No offense Sven, but this *is* the gimp-user list.
>
> Sorry, but are you trying to say that users are not able to do some
> research before asking?
>
> > That's the secon
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 00:08 -0800, Luca de Alfaro wrote:
> I am new to writing plugins - am I violating some convention by
> putting my plugin in Tools/Color Tools? It seems the best category
> from the point of view of fit, but perhaps I should use
> Script-Fu/Color Tools/ instead? I don't
Sven, I've seen you newest image window on the blog. Does it mean there
will be no script-fu or even tiny-fu top menu entry at all?
Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Filters->Colors seems most appropriate for GIMP 2.2. In 2.3 we have done
> a larger reorganization of the menus and you would probably put i
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 11:00 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> Sven, I've seen you newest image window on the blog. Does it mean there
> will be no script-fu or even tiny-fu top menu entry at all?
Indeed. Well, at least not with the set of plug-ins and scripts that
ships with 2.4. Old scr
Von: "Luca de Alfaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can you check which version you are running? Oh btw, I developed this
> under Gimp 2.2; I have no idea whether other versions of Gimp have
> different menu arrangements
They have. The menu layout of 2.3 has changed quite a lot, and there are even
som
Hi all,
I would like to ask photographers which plugins you use and you think
are most useful. Actually I use ufraw for RAW conversion and
manipulation and resynthesizer for photo retouching. Thank you.
Regards,
Fabrizio
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gi
> I would like to ask photographers which plugins you use and you think
> are most useful. Actually I use ufraw for RAW conversion and
> manipulation and resynthesizer for photo retouching. Thank you.
There is a useful redeye reducer.
Norman
___
Gim
Hi, Fabrizio
I use mainly the next plug-ins on everyday basis:
1. UFRaw to import RAW files with my digital camera. I've created a
profile with LProf for my G500 and enjoy natural pleasant colors.
2. fblur - focus blur plug-in to imitate blurriness in out-of-focus
areas (boke).
3. refocus (do no
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:43:47 +, David Marrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to apply the same layer mask to a number of stock photos. In this case
> the mask is text but it could be anything. I want to get the best image for
> the
> mask and this means not only trying different photos but
Hi,
I took Sven's advice, and moved the plug-in to Filters/Colors/Convert Color
Temperature.
Indeed Sven is right, that is a more logical place, and since the new model
going forward is to
have plugins register to the appropriate area, rather than "script-fu", I
went ahead with that.
BTW, I like
Sven Neumann wrote:
> And what's the benefit then over using the paths tool? Remember, the
> goal here is to make it easier to create polygonal selections. You can
> already do that by using the Polygon mode of the path tool and
> converting the resulting path to a selection. Sure, you could also d
Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> You need to create a layer mask first, then paste into the layer mask.
>
Thanks, I'll try that.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 20:00 +, David Marrs wrote:
> Well, I'm not requesting it, but what I got from the bugzilla report -
> particularly the comic book illustrator - was that users want to be able to
> switch quickly between drawing straight lines and drawing squiggly lines. In
> othe
Ok, I made two plugins (available from the repository):
- colortemp: converts the color temperature of an image. You can specify
the source temperature in K, or as the temperatue at which a black-body
color best matches the selected foreground color.
- whitebalance: converts the foreground colo
That's great! I really like that
idea :-)
operator
David Marrs wrote:
Anthony Ettinger wrote:
On 12/8/06, Jerry Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I light of the Microsoft/Novell agreement and all of this talk about GPL
3, I was just curious if the gimp team has ha
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 13:02 -0800, Luca de Alfaro wrote:
> I hope these can be useful to others! I was certainly very much in
> need for them, and I wonder why I was so lazy to learn script-fu only
> now (lack of documentation? nah, cannot be it ;-).
So these are actually scripts, not plug
They are scripts.
I am actually glad that the days of coding in C are past me :-) I looked at
the code for some plug-ins, and I decided I'd rather not do that! Also,
actually, I prefer scripts, as I can move them from machine to machine
without a need to recompile (not on all my machines I have
The email subject says it all, though it's very long.
I am used to creating png images with transparent pixels/area that I can
safely (safe = even work with the worst browser that people call IE) use
on the web, the trick is to convert image with transparency to indexed
color with less then 256 co
> I think perhaps it's possible to set what transparent pixel color value
> in GIMP? How should I set this value?
You should be able to perform an "Alpha to Selection", "Selection
Invert", "Edit-Fill" with the appropriate color, and then
"Edit->Clear". You might need to do a colors->threshold on
On 12/14/06, 张�|武 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The email subject says it all, though it's very long.
I am used to creating png images with transparent pixels/area that I can
safely (safe = even work with the worst browser that people call IE) use
on the web, the trick is to convert image with tra
25 matches
Mail list logo
