-- > Hi,
>
> Where can I set the default quality when saving JPEG images? The
default 85
> is too low, I want to use 98. I could not find a suitable setting
anywhere,
> either in config files or in menus. Where is it hidden?
>
> Right now I'm just using "Save as" as a workaround because the
Henrik Herranen wrote:
Manish Singh gimp.org> writes:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:19:29PM +0200, Antti MÃkelà wrote:
(No lectures on the default 85 being "enough", thank you - it is not
enough, and I can clearly see artifacts on my edited digital photographs if
saved with 85.).
You do get the lect
Dana Sibera wrote:
It's a problem, but not so much a bug as a limitation of the 'crawling
ants' view that shows a selection. Pixels aren't just 'selected' or 'not
selected' in that image, there are some pixels which are 10% selected,
20, 50, 80, 100% selected, and so on. The crawling ants outlin
On 10/02/2005, at 1:19 AM, Geoffrey wrote:
Dana Sibera wrote:
It's a problem, but not so much a bug as a limitation of the
'crawling ants' view that shows a selection. Pixels aren't just
'selected' or 'not selected' in that image, there are some pixels
which are 10% selected, 20, 50, 80, 100% se
Geoffrey wrote:
Dana Sibera wrote:
It's a problem, but not so much a bug as a limitation of the 'crawling
ants' view that shows a selection. Pixels aren't just 'selected' or
'not selected' in that image, there are some pixels which are 10%
selected, 20, 50, 80, 100% selected, and so on. The craw
Dana Sibera wrote:
On 10/02/2005, at 1:19 AM, Geoffrey wrote:
I had no idea that GIMP could select a portion of a pixel. How is it
that it can select a % of the pixel?
It depends on the way you make the selection in the first place. If you
just use the lasso to select areas, then gimp will sel
William Skaggs primate.ucdavis.edu> writes:
> First, jpeg still achieves substantial compression,
> and is still lossy, even at a quality setting of 100.
Yes, I know (see Henrik's post)
> Second, the jpeg docs recommend not using quality settings
> above 95, because they greatly increase the
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
You misunderstood. A portion of the "value" (RGBA) of the pixel is
selected, not a portion of the pixel geometry. Think of it like a
phantom (ghost, whatever you call it): The shape of the human body is
totally preserved, but you can see through it.
Still, I didn't know you
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Geoffrey
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:02 AM
> To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Re: missing pixels
>
> Olivier Ripoll wrote:
>
> > You misunderstood. A p
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 20:03 -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> while i have no idea what the developers are doing, either as a group or
> individually (it is always just a guess about everything and anything,
> not just gimp stuff), i always thought that they kept the ability to
> read psd to a minimum
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Carol Spears wrote:
> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:03:30 -0800
> From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> GIMPUser
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
>
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:40:13AM +0100, Jakub Steiner wro
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:15:36PM +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 20:03 -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
>
> > while i have no idea what the developers are doing, either as a group or
> > individually (it is always just a guess about everything and anything,
> > not just gimp stuff)
For people who would be interesting in learning a bit more about
this topic, it might be worth taking a look at the related help
docs,
http://docs.gimp.org/en/ch02s04s04.html
and
http://docs.gimp.org/en/ch04s03s05.html
Best,
-- Bill
__ __ __
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 08:32:56 -0500
Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, what is normal use? Websites? What would be a good quality value
> for a jpeg used on a website?
I suppose like every one else, I have done some experiments and am surprised
that sometimes a quality of 15-20% is fin
I'll admit up front to not having followed the conversation so far.
What quality levels you use on JPEG depends heavily on the type of data you are
wanting to store, you quality requirements, space requirements, etc. As an
example (worked up for a map conversation)
http://broggs.org/~mcbeth/CivM
Antti Mäkelä wrote:
Hi,
Where can I set the default quality when saving JPEG images? The default 85
is too low, I want to use 98. I could not find a suitable setting anywhere,
either in config files or in menus. Where is it hidden?
(No lectures on the default 85 being "enough", thank you - it is
Owen wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 08:32:56 -0500 Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
So, what is normal use? Websites? What would be a good quality
value for a jpeg used on a website?
I suppose like every one else, I have done some experiments and am
surprised that sometimes a quality of 15-20% i
Hi.
So.
TIFF format can have layers, and that is documented (although just
using the 'normal' blending mode).
Can Photoshop work with layered TIFF's?
I think the support for layers in TIFFs is a lot easier to achieve
than trying to figure out the PSD file, since the TIFF standard is
document
I would like to make an arch like the one seen in the logo on the top of the page at http://www.rma.usda.giv/ The arch is symmetrical but not a piece of an arc. And it has one color on the outside and another on the inside.
I'd appreciate any assistance anyone has to offer. I like this shape.
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 21:15, Jim Clark wrote:
> I would like to make an arch like the one seen in the logo on the
> top of the page at http://www.rma.usda.giv/ The arch is symmetrical
> but not a piece of an arc. And it has one color on the outside and
> another on the inside.
>
> I'd appre
One of the admins at my work purportedly uses Macormedia's Fireworks for raster
image editing.
He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold faced
lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format. I asked him
about layers, and he said the pngs that Firework
Eric Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[MM Fireworks]
> He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold
> faced lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format.
> I asked him about layers, and he said the pngs that Fireworks saves
> can DO LAYERS. I haven't seen
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Simon Budig
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 9:09 PM
> To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
> PNG can handle custom application specifi
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:15:19PM -0600, Jim Clark wrote:
>
> I would like to make an arch like the one seen in the logo on the top of
> the page at http://www.rma.usda.giv/ The arch is symmetrical but not a
> piece of an arc. And it has one color on the outside and another on the
> inside.
>
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
