Hi,
Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The underlying library changed between 1.2 and the 2.0 series
The underlying library? What would that be?
Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-us
Hi.
Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When using clone tool, (under brushes )
> would like to see a square ( solid ) block of 5x5 and 10x10 pix
Why don't you choose a square brush of 5 or 10 pixels then? The clone
tool can be used with all available brushes.
Sven
__
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The underlying library changed between 1.2 and the 2.0 series
>
> The underlying library? What would that be?
Ah,
Just a simpletons understanding that 1.2 used gtk 1.2 and this last one
uses gtk 2.2
If my
Richard wrote:
what to do this:
have two windows showing me the changes, between
the original photo and the sharpen photo.
The sharpen tool has a preview window. Or you can make a duplicate of
the original with ctl-d and just work on one, using the other for
comparison.
(Hope I've understood you
Hi,
Owen Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a simpletons understanding that 1.2 used gtk 1.2 and this last one
> uses gtk 2.2
Ah. I wasn't aware that the toolkit we use for the user interface is
considered the underlying library. I'd use that term for an image
manipulation library such as G
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Owen Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Just a simpletons understanding that 1.2 used gtk 1.2 and this last one
uses gtk 2.2
Ah. I wasn't aware that the toolkit we use for the user interface is
considered the underlying library. I'd use that term for an image
manipulat
Adding to this,
there should be two groups,
novice and expert. I know there allot of people whom
would like to harness the full power of Gimp.
without any flames.
Regards-
Richard
Andrew wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Owen Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Just a simpletons understanding that 1.2
Hi,
Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adding to this,
> there should be two groups,
> novice and expert. I know there allot of people whom
> would like to harness the full power of Gimp.
> without any flames.
Uh? Sorry if we appeared to be flaming but we weren't. I was only
curious. My apolo
I am trying to recreate an effect from another photo editing application
and I am wondering if there is a better way to achieve the cloud effect
I'm looking for.
I'm using "Filters, Render, Clouds, Solid Noise" to generate the clouds.
Unfortunately that only generates black and white clouds where
How does one tell Gimp, to use sRGB color profile?
when displaying images. ( gimp 2.0 )
is there a setting for this?
Thanks-
Richard
:-(
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Hi
http://gimp-savvy.com/BOOK/node67.html
Best
Asif
=ben powers wrote
I have an image of a teacup and a sign. I would like to transform the
sign so it appears to be printed on the curved surface of the tea cup.
how can i do that?
Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm using "Filters, Render, Clouds, Solid Noise" to generate the clouds.
> Unfortunately that only generates black and white clouds whereas the other
> software generates clouds using the current background and foreground
> colours.
You can apply all gradie
On Thursday 18 November 2004 21:31, Simon Budig wrote:
> Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I'm using "Filters, Render, Clouds, Solid Noise" to generate the
> > clouds. Unfortunately that only generates black and white clouds
> > whereas the other software generates clouds using the current
13 matches
Mail list logo
