Hi,
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 13:22, Dave Neary wrote:
> A number of people have suggested that a list of attendees who have
> confirmed they're going would be useful - so could anyone who plans to
> be there reply to the lists saying so, please? Don't forget to register
> at http://2004.guadec.org
Hi,
I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur
plug-in
(details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318):
The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
Filters->Blur->Blur would
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur
plug-in
(details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318):
The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
Sounds O
Why not to simply add new plugin with 3x3 convolution and call it Blur?
And leave old one with new name "Random blur".
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur
plug-in
(details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318):
The plan is to
Hi all,
Do people think that it is worthwhile for the GIMP to have a stand at
GUADEC? It would perhaps be a way to sell some t-shirts, have a couple
of computers with people doing demos, and have an easy popint-of-contact
for people when they were on their down-time.
The problem is that it woul
Hi,
Alexander Rabtchevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not to simply add new plugin with 3x3 convolution and call it
> Blur? And leave old one with new name "Random blur".
Because we are trying to simplify our menus. Suggesting to add yet
another entry to the Blur menu is counter-productive
What do you need done?
> Hi,
>
> I am forwarding this mail to gimp-user because there hasn't been any
> response on the gimp-developer mailing-list. Perhaps I can reach a
> potential contributor here or at least get some user feedback...
>
>
> ___
> Gimp
Hi,
"Eric Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What do you need done?
Huh? The forwarded mail outlines it in all details. Which part did you
not understand?
Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1149.52 +0200):
> The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
> would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
> Filters->Blur->Blur would then be a simple blur with a 3x3 convolution
> kernel. It would be fast and easy to use but
Hi,
GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
> > would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
> > Filters->Blur->Blur would then be a simple blur with a 3x3 convolution
> > kernel. It would be fast and easy to use b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1649.35 +0200):
> Sorry, but what other scripts or plug-ins are you referring to? IMO it
> would be a good thing to have a simple and fast plug-in that does the
> job w/o a dialog and I fail to see what other plug-in would provide
> this functionality.
Convolution
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1759.17 +0200):
> calling the convolution matrix plug in and scripts to preset it a simple
> replacement ?
Well, what would you call a script that just puts a menu entry and
calls convolution matrix with a fixed matrix?
> Please rephrase that to a powerful replac
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
"Eric Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What do you need done?
Huh? The forwarded mail outlines it in all details. Which part did you
not understand?
Um, no it doesn't. I just has a short blurb about little response on the dev
mailing list and needing help with the Pref
> Sven Neumann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> "Eric Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>>What do you need done?
>>
>>
>> Huh? The forwarded mail outlines it in all details. Which part did you
>> not understand?
>
> Um, no it doesn't. I just has a short blurb about little response on the
> dev
> mailin
Hi,
GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1759.17 +0200):
> > calling the convolution matrix plug in and scripts to preset it a
> > simple replacement ?
>
> Well, what would you call a script that just puts a menu entry and
> calls convolution matrix with a fixe
Hi,
Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>What do you need done?
> > Huh? The forwarded mail outlines it in all details. Which part did
> > you
> > not understand?
>
> Um, no it doesn't. I just has a short blurb about little response on
> the dev mailing list and needing help with the P
Hi!
Is there a separate list for gimp scripting, or should I ask script-fu
related questions here?
thx
Gergo
--
+-[ Kontra, Gergely<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PhD student Room IB113 ]-+
| http://www.mcl.hu/~kgergely"Olyan langesz vagyok, hogy |
| Mobil:(+36 20) 356 9656 ICQ: 1755649
hi,
as i don't know how it is called what i wanna make, i paraphrise it:
at gnome.org and other gnome-related sites there is a background image
at the very top of the site, having alternating brighter and
normal-color stripes.
how can i reach this effect?
--
klaus triendl
___
On Monday 07 June 2004 15:31, Gergely Kontra wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a separate list for gimp scripting, or should I ask script-fu
> related questions here?
>
> thx
> Gergo
There is a script-fu list in yahoogroups.
But it has movement "0" - so you may ask your questions here, no problem.
The y
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:31:48PM +0200, Gergely Kontra wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a separate list for gimp scripting, or should I ask script-fu
> related questions here?
>
please do not ask to ask. Ask.
carol
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What do you need done?
Huh? The forwarded mail outlines it in all details. Which part did
you
not understand?
Um, no it doesn't. I just has a short blurb about little response on
the dev mailing list and needing help with the Prefe
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.I
feel especially bad because we downloaded the 2.01 Windows version onto
my wifes n
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:06:32PM +0200, klaus triendl wrote:
> hi,
>
> as i don't know how it is called what i wanna make, i paraphrise it:
>
> at gnome.org and other gnome-related sites there is a background image
> at the very top of the site, having alternating brighter and
> normal-color st
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
> Hi,
> I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
> system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
> this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.I
> feel espe
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
I am afraid you guys need to fix your mail readers. The message I sent
is a multipart message containing an attachment of
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
This is the recommended way of forwarding a message. Inside this
attach
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.
Hi,
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 21:06, klaus triendl wrote:
> at gnome.org and other gnome-related sites there is a background image
> at the very top of the site, having alternating brighter and
> normal-color stripes.
>
> how can i reach this effect?
You could render a white "grid" (with only horizo
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
> >>
> >>"pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3 but GLIB ( 2.3.6 )
> >>was found!"
> >>
> >i had similar problems with debian. i di
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 12:06, klaus triendl wrote:
> hi,
>
> as i don't know how it is called what i wanna make, i paraphrise it:
>
> at gnome.org and other gnome-related sites there is a background image
> at the very top of the site, having alternating brighter and
> normal-color stripes.
>
> h
Hello,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> take advantage of the linux origins of the software. building your
> ownglib is very easy. it does not even need a lot of disc space.
Easy to build glibc, but much easier to hose your whole
system(everything) if glibc isn't built right. Also,
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6 or
the text that pkg-config found, that it would "configure" without
complaint. I don't know how to find and eliminate this text or files,
t
Robert Krueger wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I
can on this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to
configure.
Steve M Bibayoff wrote:
Hello,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
take advantage of the linux origins of the software. building your
ownglib is very easy. it does not even need a lot of disc space.
Easy to build glibc, but much easier to hose your whole
system(everything) if glibc isn't
Hello,
Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> glib != glibc
slaps palm to forhead.
Sorry about adding noise, wasn't following thread to closely.
Steve
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listi
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6
or the text that pkg-config found, that it would "configure" without
complaint. I don't know how to find and elimin
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6
or the text that pkg-config found, that it would "configure" without
complaint. I don't know how to find and elimin
You should be looking for a file named glib-2.0.pc, and it is
probably located in a directory called pkgconfig. In Fedora the
default is /usr/lib/pkgconfig but I believe it is different in
SuSE. If pkg-config data files are located elsewhere than in
the default directory, then the environment v
Hello,
Forwarring, I haven't used Suse in a very long time, and
I rarely use pkg-config, so I may be leading you down a wrong
road.
Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I need is for someone to work with me to find out how to
> eliminate
> all traces of 2.3.6 so pkg-config doesn't
* Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-07-04 14:51]:
> I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
> system.
You will find SuSE 9.0 rpms for gimp 2.01 @:
http://www.usr-local-bin/org
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
http://w
Hi,
klaus triendl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> as i don't know how it is called what i wanna make, i paraphrise it:
>
> at gnome.org and other gnome-related sites there is a background image
> at the very top of the site, having alternating brighter and
> normal-color stripes.
>
> how can i re
Hi,
Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can
> on this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.
Please go to http://gimp.org/unix/ and use the RPMS linked from there.
Sven
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-07-04 14:51]:
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.
You will find SuSE 9.0 rpms for gimp 2.01 @:
http://www.usr-local-bin/org
My thanks to all you guys for your help. This is what
William Skaggs wrote:
You should be looking for a file named glib-2.0.pc, and it is
probably located in a directory called pkgconfig. In Fedora the
default is /usr/lib/pkgconfig but I believe it is different in
SuSE. If pkg-config data files are located elsewhere than in
the default directory, th
Steve M Bibayoff wrote:
Also, what does:
$ echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
give you?
Steve
I apologize for the deletion. Here's what I get:
/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig
Even though there are multiple locations for the directory /pkgconfig,
there is only one gl
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 04:12:36PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >are you absolutely married to suse for a distribution?
> >
> No offense, Carol, but this thread isn't solving my problem. And I
> already did build glib from source...several times.
> I'm not changing distri
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Robert Krueger wrote:
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
> checking for GLIB - version >= 2.2.0...
> *** 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3, but GLIB (2.3.6)
> *** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best
> *** to remove the old v
On Monday 07 June 2004 06:58 pm, Robert Krueger wrote:
[...]
> Steve and Bill,
> I found the file you noted in /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig.It's
> the only location on my system that has this particular file,
> although I do have other *.pc files in another location
> /opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig.
I'm not sure if this has already been suggested, but what worked for me is:
locate glib-2.0.pc
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH="result"
i.e.
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$(locate glib-2.0.pc)
-
Timothy Jedlicka, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 1-630-713-4436, AOL-IM=bonzowork
Network Entomologist, Lucent Technologies,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:15:32PM -0400, BandiPat wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2004 06:58 pm, Robert Krueger wrote:
> [...]
> > [...]
>
> I don't know how much you have been mucking around with your setup, but
> it sounds as if you might have gotten things wanky. You could always
> do a repair
49 matches
Mail list logo
