Hi,
Jeff Trefftzs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 17:14, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Oh? Actually 1.3 is supposed to read the 1.2 palette and gradient
> > files directly. Did we break backward compatibility? If so, this should
> > better be fixed.
> >
> Gimp-1.3.20 seems
Hi,
Carol Spears wrote:
> I am forwarding this to the gimp-user list.
Without looking too closely at this, it doesn't seem like the
same issue. The only thing we add to jpegs now that we didn't
before (or rather, that we don't remove, whereas we did before)
is an exif header.
This doesn't seem
My gut instinct is to throw out IE.
carol
David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Carol Spears wrote:
I am forwarding this to the gimp-user list.
Without looking too closely at this, it doesn't seem like the
same issue. The only thing we add to jpegs now that we didn't
before (or rather, that we don't
Carol Spears wrote:
> My gut instinct is to throw out IE.
:) Not always an option, unfortunately.
Would it be possible to get a jpeg that does this to IE 6 so that
I can have a look at it?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary,
Lyon, France
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 04:01, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What warnings do you get exactly? Perhaps we could suppress them or
> make them more subtle warnings that appear on the console only.
>
I'm sorry -- I didn't make myself clear (too late at night, I guess.)
The warnings were on the conso
