On Wed, 11 May 2011 18:15:42 -0500, Chris Mohler wrote:
> And pngcrush might be able to shave off a few bytes afterward - I've
> gotten mixed results myself, but if bandwidth is a huge concern it may
> be worth a try.
After pngcrush, also process the image with AdvPNG (which is much faster,
and s
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
> 325 bytes is already in the trivial size range... This said, you should
> be using PNG, a much better format for Web graphics outside of photos.
> In this format a 5*35 gradient image in 212 bytes, but you can likely
> reduce it to 1*35 (157 bytes)
On 05/12/2011 12:46 AM, Adam Tong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made a 5x35 image using a gradient that i'll use as background for a div.
> I saved it as .jpg. Its size now is 325 bytes.
> Is there any additional method to make the size smaller?
325 bytes is already in the trivial size range... This said, y
