Hi,
"Michael Schumacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IIRC, one of the prerequisites for this is an API for text layers.
> Currently, all you can do is to add text in a new layer or a new floating
> selection.
Right. The PSD plug-in would have to be able to create a text layer
based on the info
Quoting Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 03:08 +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
Eric Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[MM Fireworks]
He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold
faced lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format.
I asked h
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 03:08 +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
>Eric Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>[MM Fireworks]
>> He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold
>> faced lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format.
>> I asked him about layers, and he said the
> I am pretty sure, that Macromedia licensed the current PSD specification
> from Adobe. They can afford to sign a NDA and it is probably relatively
> cheap compared to the efforts to reverse engineer it.
>
> Bye,
> Simon
Just thought I'd mention that Autodesk bought Macromedia - and Autod
Hi Greg,
Gregbair wrote:
> And, no they don't publish the extensions. Anyway, Fireworks can import PSD
> files with the text layers. I'm 101% positive Adobe didn't tell Macromedia
> how to do this, so if Fireworks can, maybe some smart GIMP person can.
It's not quite that straightforward. Presu
Gregbair ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Anyway, Fireworks can import PSD files with the text layers. I'm 101%
> positive Adobe didn't tell Macromedia how to do this, so if Fireworks
> can, maybe some smart GIMP person can.
I am pretty sure, that Macromedia licensed the current PSD specification
fro
Carol Spears wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:27:40AM +, Eric Pierce wrote:
> > Implementing the import/export of a dynamic text layer from psd would
> > be a nice addition though.
> someone just needs to do this, and i think that someone said that they
> could do this -- someone needs t
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:27:40AM +, Eric Pierce wrote:
> One of the admins at my work purportedly uses Macormedia's Fireworks for
> raster image editing.
>
> He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold
> faced lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default f
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:27:40AM +, Eric Pierce wrote:
>
>
> Implementing the import/export of a dynamic text layer from psd would be a
> nice addition though.
>
someone just needs to do this, and i think that someone said that they
could do this -- someone needs to just take the time to
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Simon Budig
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 9:09 PM
> To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
> PNG can h
Eric Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[MM Fireworks]
> He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold
> faced lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format.
> I asked him about layers, and he said the pngs that Fireworks saves
> can DO LAYERS. I haven't seen
One of the admins at my work purportedly uses Macormedia's Fireworks for raster
image editing.
He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold faced
lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format. I asked him
about layers, and he said the pngs that Firework
Hi.
So.
TIFF format can have layers, and that is documented (although just
using the 'normal' blending mode).
Can Photoshop work with layered TIFF's?
I think the support for layers in TIFFs is a lot easier to achieve
than trying to figure out the PSD file, since the TIFF standard is
document
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:15:36PM +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 20:03 -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
>
> > while i have no idea what the developers are doing, either as a group or
> > individually (it is always just a guess about everything and anything,
> > not just gimp stuff)
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Carol Spears wrote:
> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:03:30 -0800
> From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> GIMPUser
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
>
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 a
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 20:03 -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> while i have no idea what the developers are doing, either as a group or
> individually (it is always just a guess about everything and anything,
> not just gimp stuff), i always thought that they kept the ability to
> read psd to a minimum
oops,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:03:30PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
>
> by a group that was supposed to be all for freedom (it was anti-music or
> anti-copyright, iirc). shame on these people for this. it is like that
>
anti-music industry is what i meant.
music industry is an oxymoron also.
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:40:13AM +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:13 -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:26:49PM +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> > >
> > > In many cases people just want to convert their old work. They don't use
> > > proprietary formats
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:13 -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:26:49PM +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> >
> > In many cases people just want to convert their old work. They don't use
> > proprietary formats by ignorance, but simply because of a lack of option
> > and lock-in of t
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:26:49PM +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote:
>
> In many cases people just want to convert their old work. They don't use
> proprietary formats by ignorance, but simply because of a lack of option
> and lock-in of their software.
>
you mean like "they cannot afford it" or "it do
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:26:49 +0100
> From: Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: GIMPUser ,
> Enesha Fairluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Dave Neary wrote:
[...]
> ImageMagick can read XCFs).
More or less, I heard. Often less.
Michael
--
Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS
GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
___
Gimp-user mailing li
Hi,
Selon Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Michael Schumacher wrote:
> > You could also argue that you're similarily locked in when using XCF... at
> > least on systems where you can't install the GIMP.
>
> Is the XCF format proprietary? If not, then this is not a valid comparison.
It's not prop
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Jakub Steiner wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 19:41 -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
it would be nice if everyone would stop making psd files since not
everyone can use psd.
In many cases people just want to convert their old work. They don't use
proprietary formats by ignorance,
Jakub Steiner wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 19:41 -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> > it would be nice if everyone would stop making psd files since not
> > everyone can use psd.
>
> In many cases people just want to convert their old work. They don't use
> proprietary formats by ignorance, but simp
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 19:41 -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> there are differences between the native photoshop files and the native
> gimp files. gimp can handle different sized layers and other things.
I'm not too certain Photoshop doesn't. In fact, I believe Photoshop
simply doesn't expose the fa
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:58:49PM -0500, Enesha Fairluck wrote:
> Evening, and thanks for the reply:)
>
> Well that isn't the best of news I'll grant you:) Is there no way to
> convert the psd to something that gimp could import in that way?
>
i am tempted to say definately not so that someone
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:29:45PM -0500, Enesha Fairluck wrote:
> Good evening all,
>
>I am having some trouble, and I hope someone out there can help
> me:) I have a .psd template that I got from someone on the net. I
> tried opening it in the gimp 2.0 running on mandrake 10.1 and the fi
28 matches
Mail list logo
