Re: [Gimp-user] sub part 2

2005-01-28 Thread Owen Cook
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Matthew H. Plough wrote: > Sorry for replying to my own message, but I did a quick test. Here's > the result of my Blender operations: > > http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/submarine.jpg Well my contribution is from the Gimp, using a blend FG->Bg (white/black) and the

Re: [Gimp-user] sub part 2

2005-01-28 Thread Matthew H. Plough
Sorry for replying to my own message, but I did a quick test. Here's the result of my Blender operations: http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/submarine.jpg Matt Matthew H. Plough wrote: Jim Clark wrote: I realized I did not make the most important issue clear. I want it 3D in both directions.

Re: [Gimp-user] sub part 2

2005-01-28 Thread Matthew H. Plough
Jim Clark wrote: I realized I did not make the most important issue clear. I want it 3D in both directions...not just top to bottom (which even I can do) but also tapering towards the tips. So it really looks as if it is rounded at the ends as well as fat in the middle. Sorry for the lack of cla

[Gimp-user] sub part 2

2005-01-28 Thread Jim Clark
I realized I did not make the most important issue clear. I want it 3D in both directions...not just top to bottom (which even I can do) but also tapering towards the tips. So it really looks as if it is rounded at the ends as well as fat in the middle. Sorry for the lack of clarity. Thanks again