Ulp... my mistake.
You laid it out perfectly in your initial email. I just lost it somewhere in
the thread.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:14:08AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Would this new 'Print Size' dialog have its own 'Resolution' setting
Hi,
Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would this new 'Print Size' dialog have its own 'Resolution' setting?
Am I really that bad at describing things? The only thing you can
configure in "Print Size" would be the resolution. There would be two
entries to set the resolution (horziontal an
That may be the case in DTP (Desktop Pub.) programs, but not in bitmap/raster
editors.
See my updated 3 minute look at 'Image Resize' dialogs of 3 other raster editor
wanna-bes.
http://epierce.freeshell.org/gimp/print_size_research_results.php
Eric P.
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:01:53AM -0800, W
Would this new 'Print Size' dialog have its own 'Resolution' setting?
Eric P.
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 03:13:12PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So you'll also be moving Resolution from Scale Image, correct?
>
> No. The resolution entries woul
> #2 Putting it into its own menu entry (Sven's idea below) because...
I vote for the #2.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
William Skaggs wrote:
For consistency with other programs and with users' expectations,
the menu entry should probably be called "Print Setup" and should
go into the File menu next to the "Print" entry.
But this "Setup" doesn't offer margins, the orientation of thei mage on
a sheet, printer settin
For consistency with other programs and with users' expectations,
the menu entry should probably be called "Print Setup" and should
go into the File menu next to the "Print" entry.
-- Bill
__ __ __ __
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at p
Hi,
Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So you'll also be moving Resolution from Scale Image, correct?
No. The resolution entries would stay in the Scale Image dialog. I
said the plan was to not change the Scale Image dialog at all and add
an additional dialog to set the Print Size.
Sve
So you'll also be moving Resolution from Scale Image, correct?
For what it's worth, I did a good 2 minutes of research on this topic to see
what the other softies are doing for a "Print Size" type dialog.
Here:
http://epierce.freeshell.org/gimp/print_size_research_results.php
I see good argueme
On Monday 08 November 2004 12:45, Nonexistent Entity wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 12:48:44 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Does that make any sense? Is "Print Size" a good name for the
> > dialog and it's menu entry?
>
> That'd be logical, It'd probably be nice located u
Hi,
"Nonexistent Entity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Does that make any sense? Is "Print Size" a good name for the dialog
>> and it's menu entry?
>
> That'd be logical, It'd probably be nice located under File menu
> closer to other print options.
Since it's not a file operation, it would no
Hi,
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 12:48:44 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does that make any sense? Is "Print Size" a good name for the dialog
and it's menu entry?
That'd be logical, It'd probably be nice located under File menu closer to
other print options.
__
On Monday 08 November 2004 09:48, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we spent some more thoughts on this and discussed the topic on
> #gimp. Let me present the current plan and ask you for comments.
> I'd like to get it right this time since we should try to avoid
> further string changes before 2.2.0..
Hi,
we spent some more thoughts on this and discussed the topic on #gimp.
Let me present the current plan and ask you for comments. I'd like to
get it right this time since we should try to avoid further string
changes before 2.2.0...
So the plan is to keep the Scale Image dialog as is and to add
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 01:03:52PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Will the 'print size width/height' fields be returning to the Scale
> > Image dialog?
>
> Would it perhaps be better to also remove the Resolution entries from
> the Scale dialog
On Saturday 06 Nov 2004 12:03, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Will the 'print size width/height' fields be returning to the Scale
> > Image dialog?
>
> Would it perhaps be better to also remove the Resolution entries from
> the Scale dialog and add a new d
Hi,
Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will the 'print size width/height' fields be returning to the Scale
> Image dialog?
Would it perhaps be better to also remove the Resolution entries from
the Scale dialog and add a new dialog Image->Change Print Size ? The
fact that you had to use th
Hi,
Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will the 'print size width/height' fields be returning to the Scale
> Image dialog?
Uh, oh. The new dialog has been proposed here months ago. Why didn't
anyone complain earlier? We are in string and UI freeze now :( That
said, we could of course stil
Will the 'print size width/height' fields be returning to the Scale Image dialog?
Forgive me if I've misinterpreted the intentions of the new Scale Image dialog (and
let me know if I have), but after reading bug #151022, I believe the removal of the
'Print size Width/Height' fields unnesessarily
19 matches
Mail list logo
