Nem W Schlecht wrote:
> Any update on this, Bill?
Thanks for the reminder. Okay, I have uploaded the code to the
Gimp Plug-In Registry, at:
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4169
You should have a working gimptool-2.0 in order to install it.
Best,
-- Bill
__ __
> http://gug.sunsite.dk/pictures/1080149573.png
This is looking really great !!!
Hope to play with it soon.
Thanks
--
Przemek Gawronski gawronskip#at#wp#dot#pl
Linux Registered User 239544UIN:8358522
http://counter.li.org/
_
On St, 2004-03-24 at 09:47 -0800, William Skaggs wrote:
> For what it's worth, I went ahead and implemented a true variable blur filter,
That's the spirit! Looking forward to it.
cheers
--
even a stopped clock gives a right time twice a day.
___
Gimp
For what it's worth, I went ahead and implemented a true variable blur filter,
by modifying the "blur" plug-in code from 2.0. I'll put the code in the plug-in
registry after a little bug-fixing, but anyway, I put together a comparison of
what you get with variable blurring versus what you get wit
V Po 22. 03. 2004 v 11:38 -0800 píše William Skaggs:
> >Uh? It works pretty well I'd say:
> >http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/linearblur.png
>
> To my eyes this image looks sharp in the lower 2/3, and uniformly blurred
> in the upper 1/3. What you _do_ get using this method is a nice smooth
>
>Uh? It works pretty well I'd say:
>http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/linearblur.png
To my eyes this image looks sharp in the lower 2/3, and uniformly blurred
in the upper 1/3. What you _do_ get using this method is a nice smooth
transition from blurred to unblurred, which may be all you need i
On Po, 2004-03-22 at 09:12 -0800, William Skaggs wrote:
> Neither of these techniques work, as you will see if you try to apply them.
> When you mix a blurred image with a sharp image, the result does not look like
> a less-blurred image, it looks like a sharp image whose contrast has been reduced
Yes, these should work, although there are a couple of things worth pointing out.
First, the blur filters ignore the selection when computing their result, and only
apply it afterwards -- this makes your approach work, but means that it can take
a very long time if the slicing is fine. Second, if
>On 20 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> Combining a blurred picture with an unblurred picture using layer mask
>> seems to work well for me. Of course it's not the same but it should
>> look reasonably similar.
>>
>On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Jakub Steiner wrote:
>> Just create an appropriate selection f
On Saturday 20 March 2004 14:38, William Skaggs wrote:
> Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
> not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
> something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
> would be to modify the "blur" filter (
On 20 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
> > not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
> > something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
>
Hi,
"William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
> not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
> something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
> would be to modify the "blur" filter (foun
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does not have the
ability to do this, although there are ways to fake something that looks sort of
like it. The easiest way to get it would be to modify the "blur" filter (found in
randomize.c in the plug-ins directory) so that the
On Friday 19 March 2004 07:36, craniac wrote:
> Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
> > I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with
> > a gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a
> > sharp pic but gradualy get more blured and more and more ...
> > (going from left to rig
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 11:04 +0100, Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
> Hi Gimpers
>
> I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with a
> gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a sharp pic but
> gradualy get more blured and more and more ... (going from left to right
> f
Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
> I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with
> a gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a
> sharp pic but gradualy get more blured and more and more ...
> (going from left to right for example).
Make a copy of the layer you want to b
Hi Gimpers
I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with a
gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a sharp pic but
gradualy get more blured and more and more ... (going from left to right
for example).
I would be thankful for sugestions on how I can do that in Gim
17 matches
Mail list logo
