Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: Monitor for Gimp

2004-04-05 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 15:00, GSR - FR wrote: > Some time ago I had the same problem than you: I went from default > config (or lack of it) to something reasonable (or at least try). Yes, > of course, my interface changed at first, so I compensated it but did > not go back to unconfigured state

[Gimp-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: Monitor for Gimp

2004-04-01 Thread GSR - FR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-03-31 at 2350.03 +0200): > > Let try sorter: the question was "do you consider global gamma > > adjustment useful at all?" and the reply was "yes, not only useful > > but a basic". > Well, I sortof find it distracting to have the user interface gamma > corrected. If I set a

[Gimp-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: Monitor for Gimp

2004-04-01 Thread GSR - FR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-04-01 at 0908.53 +1000): > Xfree86 implements LUT manipulation through a X extension, but only > allows you to set a gamma for red, green, and blue (it generates > the LUT values internally). The basic commandline interface to > this is xgamma, and KDE/etc have added their

[Gimp-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: Monitor for Gimp

2004-03-31 Thread GSR - FR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-03-31 at 1529.45 -0500): > I am busy window shopping on Ebay etc. If the monitor has an > adjustment for color temperature is that the equivalent of > adjustable gamma? Or are they different parameters? They are different, it sets how white will look, 5500K is yellowish,