Hi,
Olivier Ripoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I cannot find this in the API documents in developer.gimp.org. Could
> you please provide a URL ?
I think I said it's in the GTK+ API reference, didn't I?
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/GtkUIManager.html
Sven
___
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Olivier Ripoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think this is just a question of time/resources. The possibility to
change the gimp menus is quite new (since version 2.2). It took much
time to restructure the old code in order to have this
possibility. IIRC, glade introduced t
Hi,
Olivier Ripoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this is just a question of time/resources. The possibility to
> change the gimp menus is quite new (since version 2.2). It took much
> time to restructure the old code in order to have this
> possibility. IIRC, glade introduced the xml-inte
> Then, it is true that the developers do not find this "interface
> skinning" desirable (it breaks documentation badly). The xml menus were
> first considered as a developer-only feature to simplify their work.
> Some people found it a new application, which is fine too.
About breaking documentat
disclaimer : I am just a gimp user, so every technical assertion below
is probably wrong ;). Please take with a grain of salt.
Jonathan D Gibbons wrote:
I was actally not suggesting that the primary developers should take up
their time making the Gimp look shiny; just that it be made possible /
>Personally, I'd prefer that the developers work on enhancing the tool
>rather than making the tool look pretty (ier).
>
>I'd suggest that if someone likes the idea of skins, they take up that
>project and do it. Then get it into the code.
>
I was actally not suggesting that the primary develo
On Monday 04 April 2005 15:29, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You probably know the GNU Image manipulation program like the
> > back of your hand but I think using the Procedure Browser/Plugin
> > Database it to search for things is a massively useful and
Hi,
"Michael Schumacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Huh? Something gives me the impression that the GimpShop author
> hould have spent more time in #gimp...
He didn't care to ask any of the developers before starting this. All
he did was asking a question in a GIMP forum that deals with resou
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You probably know the GNU Image manipulation program like the back of your
> hand but I think using the Procedure Browser/Plugin Database it to search
> for things is a massively useful and underrated feature. It encourages
> users to more easily fin
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
> > Given that all the string changes in GimpShop occured in translatable
> > strings, one wonders why patching the source was needed at all. The only
> > other changes were to the menu files, which have been external since the
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:27:38 +0200
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Jonathan D Gibbons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-us
> Given that all the string changes in GimpShop occured in translatable
> strings, one wonders why patching the source was needed at all. The only
> other changes were to the menu files, which have been external since the
> change to GtkUIManager.
Maybe for the script-fus...
> In fact, with a s
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:08:03AM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> > Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:46:47 -0500 (EST)
> > From: Jonathan D Gibbons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> > Subject: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop
> >
> > Now,
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is a whole lot of maintainance work, way more than you might
> think. I would hope optimistically that things could be adjusted to
> work well for all kinds of users and I think it would be better to
> make efforts to improve the defaults first
Alan Horkan wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:28:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pierre-Alexis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tom Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GimpShop
Maybe GimpShop should become an option in the
On Monday 04 April 2005 00:07, Eric Pierce wrote:
> Even with the Mnot bit?
Obviously, in time, it should be:
Gimp Is More than P.
(just check CVS splash screen :-) )
>
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 10:57:11AM -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
> > David Herman wrote:
> >
> > (snip)
> >
> > >Not to disparrag
Even with the Mnot bit?
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 10:57:11AM -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
> David Herman wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> >Not to disparrage the hard work that was put into this hack but...
> >Let gimp be gimp and photoshop be photoshop.
>
> I completely agree.
>
> Peace...
>
> Tom
>
>
> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:46:47 -0500 (EST)
> From: Jonathan D Gibbons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Subject: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop
>
> Now, what I think would be really wonderful along these lines would be a
> setup whereby The Gimp c
Jonathan D Gibbons wrote:
Now, what I think would be really wonderful along these lines would be a
setup whereby The Gimp can be easily "skinned" to a rearranged UI like
this.
Personally, I'd prefer that the developers work on enhancing the tool
rather than making the tool look pretty (ier).
I'
Frédéric wrote:
(snip)
If someone really want to use Gimp, he will find the menu. If gimpshop can
help to migrate from Photoshop, this is OK. And if Gimp gives choice to
arrange menus, this is great. Each one can choose the best solution for
him.
Based on the positive feedback on that blog, it
On Dimanche 03 Avril 2005 16:31, David Herman wrote:
> Imagine someone (a new user) has set their gimp menus up to resemble
> photoshop. Now for some reason they can't figure out how to scale
> their image. So they wisely come to this list (they are using gimp
> after all) and ask their question "
David Herman wrote:
(snip)
Not to disparrage the hard work that was put into this hack but...
Let gimp be gimp and photoshop be photoshop.
I completely agree.
Peace...
Tom
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkel
On Saturday 02 April 2005 7:46 pm, Jonathan D Gibbons wrote:
> Now, what I think would be really wonderful along these lines
> would be a setup whereby The Gimp can be easily "skinned" to a
> rearranged UI like this.
> That way, we can have a Gimp skin that is familiar to Photoshop
> users, a Gimp
Now, what I think would be really wonderful along these lines would be a
setup whereby The Gimp can be easily "skinned" to a rearranged UI like
this.
That way, we can have a Gimp skin that is familiar to Photoshop users, a
Gimp skin that is familiar to FireWorks users, etc., and perhaps even som
24 matches
Mail list logo
