but something is really a pain if you add a doctype for html 4.01 it does
not work anymore, only the one for 3.2 works
and then of course as ID and STYLE for DIV did not exist in version 3.2 the
page is not anymore W3C compliant
Philippe
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
At 15:1
On Monday 23 December 2002 02:37 pm, Philippe Rousselot wrote:
> sorry
>
> I forgot it would be sent as html page
>
> go to
>
> www.utpala.net/test.html
>
>
> Philippe
===
Konqueror, Konqueror with Mozilla bindings and Mozilla 1.2 all view the
page the same for me. Everything
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:37:04 +0100
Philippe Rousselot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry
>
> I forgot it would be sent as html page
>
> go to
>
> www.utpala.net/test.html
>
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Gimp-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sorry
I forgot it would be sent as html page
go to
www.utpala.net/test.html
Philippe
At 20:08 23/12/02 +0100, you wrote:
At 12:40 23/12/02 -0500, you wrote:
On 2002-12-23 many people:
>
>
Talked about png images and web browser compatibility
please try this on your browsers
the first i
At 12:40 23/12/02 -0500, you wrote:
On 2002-12-23 many people:
>
>
Talked about png images and web browser compatibility
please try this on your browsers
the first image is a png and is visible with IE 6.0.2800 at least including
the alpha transparency. I do not know about the
On 2002-12-23 at 0135.58 -0800, Joshua Thorin Messer typed this:
>
> Oh, wait when you wrote "Currently browsers do not support PNG
> widely enough to use PNG instead" you might have meant "Currently
> Internet Explorer on Windows..." in which you are correct. But guess
> what? If the net is full
