Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then olivier ripoll declared
Right, I actually got on really well with using a layer mask! - However,
now i am down to the very fine details im not sure i have the right
brush. You mentioned 'feathered' but i dont see that in the tool
options? Im using a 3px fuzzy circl
* and then olivier ripoll declared
> >Right, I actually got on really well with using a layer mask! - However,
> >now i am down to the very fine details im not sure i have the right
> >brush. You mentioned 'feathered' but i dont see that in the tool
> >options? Im using a 3px fuzzy circle, is
Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then olivier ripoll declared
Right, do you think that photo is now rubbish? do i need to start over
from the beggining?
No, but you will not obtain a final good result with only the eraser or
the magic wand selection tool. At some point you need a tool where you
can
* and then olivier ripoll declared
> >Right, do you think that photo is now rubbish? do i need to start over
> >from the beggining?
>
> No, but you will not obtain a final good result with only the eraser or
> the magic wand selection tool. At some point you need a tool where you
> can sele
Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then olivier ripoll declared
I think the following tutorial corresponds more or less to what you want
to achieve.
http://www.gimpguru.org/Tutorials/ReplaceForeground/
The problem of loosing pixels you had with you dog and with your sister
would be easily avoided if:
* and then olivier ripoll declared
> I think the following tutorial corresponds more or less to what you want
> to achieve.
> http://www.gimpguru.org/Tutorials/ReplaceForeground/
>
> The problem of loosing pixels you had with you dog and with your sister
> would be easily avoided if:
>
> 1
Nick Wilson wrote:
Hi everyone,
Im selecting a subject (my sister) from her background, for use as a
transparent jpg on a webpage. Here is the pic so far:
http://www.stylesheet.org/2.jpg
I know i need to replace quite a few pixels that got inadvertently
transparentized (?) but my question is this
