Hi,
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> Gentlemen (an assumption not evidenced by quoted above), opinions are
> to be expressed and critized, but personalities and associated
> feelings need to be excluded. Pistole at 20+ paces are *not* an
> option and should not be considered. This type of display affec
* Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-05-04 07:49]:
> Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >If the web-site concerns you, then you should be willing to touch it.
> >If you aren't willing to do any changes to gimp-web CVS module, then
> >you should IMO refrain from asking for changes. Doing so only shows
> >dis
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thus far, no-one on the web team has said anything about the
matter. It would be nice if someone would say "sure, send screenshots
to me". I don't feel comfortable changing anything in the gimp-web
module any more.
Well, I am afraid th
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I disagree. I think that www.gimp.org is a site for GIMP users, and
> that includes bleeding edge users. developer.gimp.org is a site for
> GIMP developers, at least that was my understanding of the motivation
> behind it.
Well, that was not at all th
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
For what it's worth, I do not have any problem with nice, but out of
date, screenshots being on www.gimp.org - for example, we had a lot
of screenshots from the 1.1 series on www.gimp.org before the
migration. In fact, devel screens
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thus far, no-one on the web team has said anything about the
> matter. It would be nice if someone would say "sure, send screenshots
> to me". I don't feel comfortable changing anything in the gimp-web
> module any more.
Well, I am afraid that it won'
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For what it's worth, I do not have any problem with nice, but out of
> date, screenshots being on www.gimp.org - for example, we had a lot
> of screenshots from the 1.1 series on www.gimp.org before the
> migration. In fact, devel screenshots are a gre
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
> PS: Here are some screenshots of the HEAD branch:
>
> http://sven.gimp.org/gimp-new-image-dialog.png
> http://sven.gimp.org/gimp-stroke-dialog.png
> http://sven.gimp.org/gimp-canvas-size-dialog.png
>
> Remember that this is not the final dialog layou
Hi,
has there been any progress with respect to screenshots? Now that GIMP
HEAD starts to actually look differently and gets new features, I'd
really like to replace the screenshots on developer.gimp.org with new
ones to get people interested in the current development. So please,
grab whatever sc
Hi Branko,
Branko Collin wrote:
On 4 May 2004, at 0:01, David Neary wrote:
It would be really cool to have lots & lots of screenshots of the GIMP
on www.gimp.org. Could someone from the web team take responsibility
for this and publish an e-mail address where screenshots can be sent
to be included
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The problem with the screenshots on dgo is that they are screenshots
> > of the 1.3.x development version. Most of them clearly don't look like
> > 2.0. It shouldn't be too difficult to redo these shots with an
> > uptodate version. I am sure people
Hi Sven
Sven Neumann wrote:
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I was just looking for some nice looking screenshots to show off
on the GUADEC GIMP pages, and the best ones are all on
developer.gimp.org
The problem with the screenshots on dgo is that they are screenshots
of the 1.3.x developme
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was just looking for some nice looking screenshots to show off
> on the GUADEC GIMP pages, and the best ones are all on
> developer.gimp.org
The problem with the screenshots on dgo is that they are screenshots
of the 1.3.x development version. Most
13 matches
Mail list logo
