Hi,
I've reformatted the upcoming Press Release and the About the GIMP
documents which Raymond Ostertag, Eric Lamarque, David Neary et al has
prepared.
The results are available at http://brix.gimp.org/files/presspack/
Comments and suggestions are very welcome. If you have large changes for
the
Press release looks good. I would change the phrase "channels and layers" to
"channels, layers and masks". Or somehow advertise that Gimp
has masks (something that Photoshop Elements 2.0 is lacking btw).
-
Timothy Jedlicka, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 1-630-713-4436, AOL-IM=bonzowork
Network Entomologi
Hi all,
So, over the weekend I did some work on the press pack, mainly re-wording some
thing in the article (there are some things I removed too) to get to a 4 page
article. The article, with screenshots, is online at
http://scrappy.ath.cx/~bolsh/ - the article itself is in presspack.pdf (1.1MB
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 17:21, Dave Neary wrote:
> I don't like the paragraph at all for a press release. Perhaps just the "limited
> by the collective imagination..." part, but it's a bad idea to start comparing
> ourselves with photoshop at all in a press release. Plus, this isn't even
> positiv
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't like the paragraph at all for a press release. Perhaps just
> the "limited by the collective imagination..." part, but it's a bad
> idea to start comparing ourselves with photoshop at all in a press
> release. Plus, this isn't even positive lan
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
"What is not in the plans is for Gimp to turn into a clone of Photoshop.
For one thing, the resources of a large corporation like Adobe far
outmatch what any free software team, working for the joy of programming,
can contribute. Furthermore, the GIMP developers would prefe
Such things should only be stated if proven by comparison :). In other
case it sounds like a boast :-)
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PS I've included the deleted paragraph here in case anyone really feels
the need to start another wiki page and make those c
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PS I've included the deleted paragraph here in case anyone really feels
> the need to start another wiki page and make those comparisons:
>
> "What is not in the plans is for Gimp to turn into a clone of Photoshop.
> For one thing, the resources of a
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, raymond ostertag wrote:
> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 18:49:03 +0100
> From: raymond ostertag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Press pack requests
>
> Le lun 08/03/2004 à 17:38, Dave Neary a écrit :
>
> > >
Le lun 08/03/2004 à 17:38, Dave Neary a écrit :
> > However as a user I'm fascinated by part of the closing statement
> > "Gimp can already do many things that are difficult or impossible with
> > Photoshop" and I would love if the author or anyone else could elaborate
> > on this. It would make
Hi Alan,
the idea of a Wiki is that you edit the page directly. I think that
would be easier and more helpful than commenting on it. Perhaps we
should have made this clear...
> weird. mozilla (at the top of the browser tab) says the following
> screenshot is PNG
> http://developer.gimp.org/screen
Hi Alan,
Alan Horkan wrote:
- Could native english speakers who have a few minutes please look at the
"What's new in GIMP 2.0" page (http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/WhatsNew) and correct
any grammar problems?
The document starts with a TODO note that hopefully will be removed
Eventually :)
Thanks for y
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Dave Neary wrote:
> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:31:53 +0100
> From: Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Gimp Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> GIMPUser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Gimp-user] Press pack requests
>
>
> Hi all,
Hi all,
The 2.0 release is getting closer, and there are still some thing missing from
the press pack we want to send out.
- Could native english speakers who have a few minutes please look at the
"What's new in GIMP 2.0" page (http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/WhatsNew) and correct
any grammar proble
14 matches
Mail list logo
