On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:26:07AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> BandiPat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Now I'm not sure if the Gimp folks check all the plugins out before
> > making them available or adding them, but it would seem logical to me
> > for them to have control over that
Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
interesting.
could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
between the two separately licensed, separately
Hi,
BandiPat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now I'm not sure if the Gimp folks check all the plugins out before
> making them available or adding them, but it would seem logical to me
> for them to have control over that, so no harmful plugins would be
> submitted. Have a contributor send the
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believe Gimp & it's Plugins may be compared to
> Firefox & it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
> implemented identically).
>
> And theres something I love with Firefox and it's
> extensions : the update system.
This
On Thursday 26 May 2005 03:36 pm, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:23:23PM -0400, BandiPat wrote:
> > I'll try to clarify Pierre's & Erika's points, if I'm reading them
> > correctly. You have obviously gone off in a different direction
> > than I think either of them were heading,
On Thursday 26 May 2005 04:07 pm, Alan Horkan wrote:
> > Have someone make a depositry of plugins
>
> http://registry.gimp.org
>
> It isn't as easy to use as the Mozilla plugin system but I wanted to
> make sure you were aware of it.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Alan Horkan
> http://advogato.org/person/AlanHo
> Have someone make a depositry of plugins
http://registry.gimp.org
It isn't as easy to use as the Mozilla plugin system but I wanted to make
sure you were aware of it.
Sincerely
Alan Horkan
http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/
___
Gimp-user maili
Erika De Jesus wrote:
> yeah, i think that's gonna be great! though my prob is that
> i'm no developer. and that im sorry that i can't contribute
> plugins, brushes, patterns, and stuff. though i am pro to your
> decision. the only question is... who does all the updating
> and server paying? i don
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:23:23PM -0400, BandiPat wrote:
> I'll try to clarify Pierre's & Erika's points, if I'm reading them
> correctly. You have obviously gone off in a different direction than I
> think either of them were heading, but you also make some good points.
> Is that being diplo
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
>
> >interesting.
> >
> >could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
> >similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
> >between the two separately licensed, separately funded
On Thursday 26 May 2005 01:16 pm, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
> > Carol Spears wrote:
> > >could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
> > >similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
> > >between the t
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
>
> >could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
> >similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
> >between the two separately licensed, separately funded softwares that do
>
yeah, i think that's gonna be great! though my prob is that
i'm no developer. and that im sorry that i can't contribute
plugins, brushes, patterns, and stuff. though i am pro to your
decision. the only question is... who does all the updating
and server paying? i dont think we can make GIMP pay it
Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
I believe Gimp & it's Plugins may be compared to
Firefox & it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
implemented identically).
interesting.
could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
s
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
>
> I believe Gimp & it's Plugins may be compared to
> Firefox & it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
> implemented identically).
>
interesting.
could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
similarities and i am i
Hi,
I believe Gimp & it's Plugins may be compared to
Firefox & it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
implemented identically).
And theres something I love with Firefox and it's
extensions : the update system.
So I was thinking : why not have such update system
for the Gimp ? It would be reall
16 matches
Mail list logo
