On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:22:14 -0600, Alex Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is getting off the topic of the Gimp, but you've piqued my
> interest. I just took a digital photo and modified it very slightly
> with the Gimp, and used exiftool to print out the exif data for the
> original and t
Rafael i'm almost sure you will win, i was a expert of traditional photo
collage and manipulation (as in darkroom ) and at that time, if i wished i
could bypass most of detection method
But time pass by...Now i do photo collage with computer but for only artistic
purpose and so i never had reas
This is getting off the topic of the Gimp, but you've piqued my
interest. I just took a digital photo and modified it very slightly
with the Gimp, and used exiftool to print out the exif data for the
original and the modification, and diff'd the two exif outputs. The
only things I saw that might
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:23:13 +0200 (CEST), "Alchemie foto\\grafiche" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raphael Quinet wrote
> _" I do not
> want to say too much about that because I do not want to give too many
> ideas to the crooks, but let's say that the way some things are split
> or ordered in the
Raphael Quinet wrote
_" I do not
want to say too much about that because I do not want to give too many
ideas to the crooks, but let's say that the way some things are split
or ordered in the JPEG file is usually different between digital
cameras and image editing software."_
Well i too don't wan
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 10:56:53 -0300, "Lucas Prado Melo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> How can I identify (using gimp) if a photograph has been faked?
>
There are different techniques that can be applied. Some of the focus
on detecting if the image has been modified (detecting suspicious
patterns
On Sunday 16 September 2007 15:56, Lucas Prado Melo wrote:
> How can I identify (using gimp) if a photograph has been faked?
>
> []'s
> ___
> Gimp-user mailing list
> Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-
Anthony Ettinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Lucas Prado Melo wrote:
> > > How can I identify (using gimp) if a photograph has been faked?
[...]
> I would be interested in learning more about high-level techniques for
> analysis as well.
> If anyone finds a resource.
At the last chaos communica
On 9/18/07, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lucas Prado Melo wrote:
> > How can I identify (using gimp) if a photograph has been faked?
>
> It would depend on how good a job was done in faking the image. The basics
> involve using a high zoom factor to see the pixels. Look for artifacts c
Lucas Prado Melo wrote:
> How can I identify (using gimp) if a photograph has been faked?
It would depend on how good a job was done in faking the image. The basics
involve using a high zoom factor to see the pixels. Look for artifacts created
by a poor blend of the added in (faked) part of the
Well, yes if they did a very bad job of it, like saving the photo with
all the additional layers intact.
> How can I identify (using gimp) if a photograph has been faked?
>
> []'s
> ___
> Gimp-user mailing list
> Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> https
How can I identify (using gimp) if a photograph has been faked?
[]'s
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
12 matches
Mail list logo
