Hi,
Brad Kligerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By hook or by crook, I finally managed to compile GIMP2.0. I still
> don't understand why it was such a mess, but I learned a whole bunch
> in the process. Thanks go out to both of you for your patience.
>
> As for GIMP 2.0, I started it immediate
Sven+x/
By hook or by crook, I finally managed to compile GIMP2.0. I still don't
understand why it was such a mess, but I learned a whole bunch in the
process. Thanks go out to both of you for your patience.
As for GIMP 2.0, I started it immediately after I got it compiled and
everything worke
Sven/
Just like misfit-x pointed out already, this is of course completely
wrong. /etc/ld.so.conf has nothing to do with pkg-config. I would
strongly suggest to take a short look at the man-pages before doing
such changes. It certainly helps to know what files you are editing.
Point well taken.
misfit-x/
Thanks for pursuing this with me.
# rpm -qa | grep gtk+
The results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-1.3.23]# rpm -qa | grep gtk+
gtk+-devel-1.2.10-25
gtk+-1.2.10-25
But when I changed it from _gtk+_ to _rpm -qa | grep gtk2_ I got the
following :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-1.3.23]# rpm -qa | g
Hi,
misfit-x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If that didn't work, then there's a config somewhere that's still saying
> there's a GTK+-2.2.1 somewhere. I have another idea... REinstall
> GTK+2.2.1, then uninstall it. Then reinstall (just make install in the
> source tree you compiled GTK+-2.2.4 in,
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 18:38, Brad Kligerman wrote:
> checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.2.2...
> *** 'pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0' returned 2.2.4, but GTK+ (2.2.1)
> *** was found!
> When I tried to uninstall GTK+ (2.2.1) as you suggested, it said 2.2.1
> was not installed.
# rpm -qa | grep gt
Hi,
misfit-x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't know about tablet though because I don't have an art tablet or
> anything, just mouse.
If tablet support is desired, gtk+ needs to be configured to provide
it. To do so, pass the option --with-xinput=xfree to the gtk+
configure script.
Sven
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 09:40, Brad Kligerman wrote:
> Hi all/
>
> I've been trying to upgrade from GIMP 1.2.3 that was installed with RH9
> to GIMP 1.3.23.
> It won't configure, and I get the following...
I solved this one myself. Just get GTK+2.2.4 SOURCES (not the rpm or anything),
and compile
Hi,
Brad Kligerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I already had edited _/etc/ld.so.conf_ and ran _ldconfig_ as
> suggested in the message.
So where did you put /usr/local/lib in your library search path then?
Does it appear before the path holding the older version of the library?
Sven
Brad Kligerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've been trying to upgrade from GIMP 1.2.3 that was installed with
RH9 to GIMP 1.3.23.
It won't configure, and I get the following...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-1.3.23]# ./configure
..>
checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/
Hi,
Brad Kligerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been trying to upgrade from GIMP 1.2.3 that was installed with
> RH9 to GIMP 1.3.23.
> It won't configure, and I get the following...
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-1.3.23]# ./configure
> ..>
> checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:40:47PM +0100, Brad Kligerman wrote:
Hi all/
I've been trying to upgrade from GIMP 1.2.3 that was installed with RH9
to GIMP 1.3.23.
It won't configure, and I get the following...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-1.3.23]# ./configure
..>
checking for pkg-config... (cache
Hi all/
I've been trying to upgrade from GIMP 1.2.3 that was installed with RH9
to GIMP 1.3.23.
It won't configure, and I get the following...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gimp-1.3.23]# ./configure
..>
checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.2.2...
*
13 matches
Mail list logo
