Hi,
"William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have noticed before that the previews for the image map tools (of
> which color balance is one) seem slower than they ought to be. The
> operation they are doing is extrememly simple, so they ought to be
> as fast as other simple tools like bu
Hi,
"Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am afraid you've hit a design issue with the GIMP - when adjusting
> colors via tools, i t simply operates on the whole image for each
> preview step.
I don't think this counts as a design issue. A design problem would be
somethin
Hi,
Dana Sibera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm having what seem to be performance issues with editing some images
> about 4000x2200 pixels (they're panoramas of multiple photos), and
> would like some advice on the best settings in GIMP for RAM use, or
> whether what I'm seeing is normal.
>
>
Dana Silbera wrote:
> In any case, the specific problem I'm getting is while colour balancing
> of the final image, and each shift of the slider requires a bit over 20
> seconds to complete the colour change over the image, which seems
> slower than it should be. It's just a little difficult to r
Hi Dana!
I am afraid you've hit a design issue with the GIMP -
when adjusting colors via tools, i t simply operates on the whole
image for each preview step.
The options let to you right now are workarounds:
Either select a small part of the image, preview on that part, hit
cancel, select all
I'm having what seem to be performance issues with editing some images
about 4000x2200 pixels (they're panoramas of multiple photos), and
would like some advice on the best settings in GIMP for RAM use, or
whether what I'm seeing is normal.
I have 640MB in this machine, and GIMP is set to use a
