On Saturday 21 July 2007, Asif Lodhi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... While this is a
> > major draw back with gimp I understand the need is recognised and
> > will hopefully be remedied in the near fut
Hi,
On 7/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... While this is a major draw
> back with gimp I
> understand the need is recognised and will hopefully be remedied in the near
> future. When that happens gimp will be laying the foundatio
On Friday 20 July 2007 00:26:00 Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Am Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:52:58 +0100 schrieb David Marrs:
> > David Southwell wrote:
> >> Anyone...
> >> Finally does anyone have a handle on the timeframe for 2.4??
> >
> > Not really. I think you'll just have to be patient.
> >
> > Incid
Am Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:52:58 +0100 schrieb David Marrs:
> David Southwell wrote:
>> Anyone...
>> Finally does anyone have a handle on the timeframe for 2.4??
>>
> Not really. I think you'll just have to be patient.
>
> Incidentally, unless you've got a pro camera and lens, a high quality,
> pro
Brian Vanderburg II wrote:
> I frequently use the GIMP for patterns/fractals that are to be used as
> height fields. For this, it would be nice if 16bit gray scale was
> available. I figure GIMP will eventually have 16bit support.
>
Same here. there are instances when it would be nice to use
I frequently use the GIMP for patterns/fractals that are to be used as
height fields. For this, it would be nice if 16bit gray scale was
available. I figure GIMP will eventually have 16bit support.
B. Vanderburg II
David Marrs wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
>
>> Anyone...
>> Finally does
David Southwell wrote:
> Anyone...
> Finally does anyone have a handle on the timeframe for 2.4??
>
Not really. I think you'll just have to be patient.
Incidentally, unless you've got a pro camera and lens, a high quality, properly
calibrated monitor and a very good printer, I really don't think
On Sunday 08 July 2007 08:05:45 Kim Johansson wrote:
> Then it seems like it will come some day. ;)
>
> http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/UserFaq#head-455dd92a98eee71c3c35de7fd48065e75d3c
>92ca
>
> 2007/7/8, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-08-07 10:33]:
>
Then it seems like it will come some day. ;)
http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/UserFaq#head-455dd92a98eee71c3c35de7fd48065e75d3c92ca
2007/7/8, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
* David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-08-07 10:33]:
> Is there any chance of Gimp supporting 16 bit color in the near
* David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-08-07 10:33]:
> Is there any chance of Gimp supporting 16 bit color in the near
> future? or is it doomed to be limited to 8 bit which is not really
> suitable for manipulating high quality digital images?
Answered in the wiki.
--
Patrick Shanahan
Hi
Is there any chance of Gimp supporting 16 bit color in the near future? or is
it doomed to be limited to 8 bit which is not really suitable for
manipulating high quality digital images?
David Southwell
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF
11 matches
Mail list logo