John Dietsch wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Greg Rundlett wrote:
rob wrote:
Rember you need all the -dev rpms if you want to compile stuff.
It would be a much much beter idea for you to install the rpm. Ditching
suse for debian would also be a good idea.
I too had literally the worst ex
Thong Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Robert Krueger wrote:
checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 2.2.0...
*** 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3, but GLIB (2.3.6)
*** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it i
Steve M Bibayoff wrote:
Also, what does:
$ echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
give you?
Steve
I apologize for the deletion. Here's what I get:
/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig
Even though there are multiple locations for the directory /pkgconfig,
there is only one gl
William Skaggs wrote:
You should be looking for a file named glib-2.0.pc, and it is
probably located in a directory called pkgconfig. In Fedora the
default is /usr/lib/pkgconfig but I believe it is different in
SuSE. If pkg-config data files are located elsewhere than in
the default directory, th
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-07-04 14:51]:
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.
You will find SuSE 9.0 rpms for gimp 2.01 @:
http://www.usr-local-bin/org
My thanks to all you guys for your help. T
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6
or the text that pkg-config found, that it would "configure" without
complaint. I don't know
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6
or the text that pkg-config found, that it would "configure" without
complaint. I don't know
Robert Krueger wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I
can on this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to
configure
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.I
feel especially bad because we downloaded the 2.01 Windows version onto
my wifes n
10 matches
Mail list logo
