On Sunday, July 31, 2011 04:33:43 am Ofnuts wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 10:33 PM, John Culleton wrote:
> > I have a different problem. I am processing a series of screen
shots
> > through Gimp to desaturate them (color pages cost more then B/W
> > pages.) Each time I retrieve a screen shot from:
> >
>
You might also want to try browsing the archives of the wacom list,
then maybe join that list and ask for help there.
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-discuss
Mike
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https:
On 2011-07-31 19:46, dh wrote:
> You could try using your tablet w/ krita or mypaint,
or Inkscape.
> If those fail in the same way then look at X11, (or Ubuntu and its
> derivitives in general)
> as the source of the problem
Or consider the case that there may be a hardware problem with the
t
On Sunday, July 31, 2011, Roseroberta Pauling wrote:
> can someone please help me..I want to stop getting all these
> messages.
On Sunday, July 31, 2011, Roseroberta Pauling wrote:
> can someone please help me..I want to stop getting all these messages.
-snip
On Sunday, July 31, 2011, Fred J wrote:
> So is no one able to help with this problem?
snip--
Don't expect that I can help, but have you explored the idea that it could
be X11 related rather than gimp?
> >>> >> Well, sort of. The stylus becomes less responsive, for some
>
On 07/31/2011 05:32 PM, Fred J wrote:
This defaults to 100% IIRC. It only effects the *display* during
transform.
This is the time when it shouldn't display at 100%.
Let's say I have a bunch of layers with various graphical elements.
The one at the bottom is a photo that needs to be
This defaults to 100% IIRC. It only effects the *display* during
transform.
This is the time when it shouldn't display at 100%.
Let's say I have a bunch of layers with various graphical elements. The
one at the bottom is a photo that needs to be scaled up and rotated, so
that it fits in
Try the same function in Photoshop and you'll see that it is not
inaccurate. If you put a layer below other layers, and then work on
them, there is no reason why it should suddenly "display" above all the
layers, at full opacity. How I am supposed to see behind it? If I
wanted it in front of
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Fred J wrote:
> **
> This, besides the text tool, is probably one of the most unintuitive
> features in Gimp.
>
> - Find an image on Google / hard drive.
> - Drop it into your working area.
> - Change it's transparency.
> - Resize / Rotate and, suddenly, the trans
So is no one able to help with this problem?
On 30/07/2011 21:00, gimp-user-requ...@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu wrote:
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:49:37 -0700
> From: Patrick Horgan
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Wacom weirdness
> To:gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> Message-ID:<4e338d61.10..
This, besides the text tool, is probably one of the most unintuitive
features in Gimp.
- Find an image on Google / hard drive.
- Drop it into your working area.
- Change it's transparency.
- Resize / Rotate and, suddenly, the transparency reverts to original
state.
This last step makes no sen
I wanted to make a rough metallic surface and I ended up with this by
fiddling around with a back-to-white gradient and emboss it. I finally
got a clean 200x200 image that alings seamlessy and can be used as a
pattern:
http://www.staldal.nu/gimp/patterns/metallic.pat
(You can make it golden by
On 07/30/2011 10:33 PM, John Culleton wrote:
I have a different problem. I am processing a series of screen shots
through Gimp to desaturate them (color pages cost more then B/W
pages.) Each time I retrieve a screen shot from:
/usr/local/active/scribusp
and desaturate it I must chase down t
13 matches
Mail list logo
