Ya, why do I have to always click continue on the no disk dialog every time I
save or open an image in gimp. Also when using plug ins. Is it because my hard
disk is labeled H and not C??? Help its annoying.
--
friesenlyle (via gimpusers.com)
___
Gimp-
This is good to hear. Rendering speed is important, especially if Gimp
wants to be a viable competitor to the mainstream counterparts, where
man-sized canvasses are concerned.
On 03/02/2011 03:18, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 02/02/2011
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 02:32 PM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
>> Will the next release of Gimp be a bit quicker?
>
> I'm afraid not; the next release of GIMP, GIMP 2.8, will not be quicker
> in this regard.
>
> The release after that, GIMP 3.0, will focus on
mintakax wrote:
> Sorry mistype-- the rev is 2.2.13 ... is this an old rev ?
Yes. Latest version is 2.6.11
ns
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
>>Hi,
>>phorg...@yahoo.com (2011-02-01 at 1834.43 -0800):
>>> On 02/01/2011 01:24 PM, GSR - FR wrote:
>>> > ... elision by patrick ...
>>> > Ooops, right... yet another reminder of why I hate interfaces that
>>> > hide and forget you opened the "|>". I just noticed the selector now,
>>> > different
>Hi,
>phorg...@yahoo.com (2011-02-01 at 1834.43 -0800):
>> On 02/01/2011 01:24 PM, GSR - FR wrote:
>> > ... elision by patrick ...
>> > Ooops, right... yet another reminder of why I hate interfaces that
>> > hide and forget you opened the "|>". I just noticed the selector now,
>> > different than t
On 02/02/2011 02:32 PM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
> Will the next release of Gimp be a bit quicker?
I'm afraid not; the next release of GIMP, GIMP 2.8, will not be quicker
in this regard.
The release after that, GIMP 3.0, will focus on running on GTK 3.0 and
bringing high bit depths into the picture.
On 02/02/2011 03:32 PM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
> I've asked this before, with no answers. My aim, as a happy Gimp user,
> is not to slate the software, but to improve it. I am not a developer,
> but rather a digital artist who uses Gimp extensively.
>
> Working on large canvases, I see that Gimp slow
I've asked this before, with no answers. My aim, as a happy Gimp user,
is not to slate the software, but to improve it. I am not a developer,
but rather a digital artist who uses Gimp extensively.
Working on large canvases, I see that Gimp slows down, where rendering
is concerned. For exampl
