> On Monday 27 July 2009 23:17:26 Norman Silverstone wrote:
> > Quite some time ago a method for sharpening was given here and which
> > I have enjoyed using. Unfortunately, I have lost my notes and I would
> > be grateful if the method could be posted again, please.
>
> are you looking for this
On Monday 27 July 2009 23:17:26 Norman Silverstone wrote:
> Quite some time ago a method for sharpening was given here and which
> I have enjoyed using. Unfortunately, I have lost my notes and I would
> be grateful if the method could be posted again, please.
are you looking for this turorial: "sm
Norman Silverstone wrote on Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:47:26PM +0100:
> Quite some time ago a method for sharpening was given here and which I
> have enjoyed using. Unfortunately, I have lost my notes and I would be
> grateful if the method could be posted again, please.
For things like eye popping
Norman Silverstone wrote:
> Quite some time ago a method for sharpening was given here and which I
> have enjoyed using. Unfortunately, I have lost my notes and I would be
> grateful if the method could be posted again, please.
>
> Norman
>
Hi,
I like the results of Tools -> Gegl operation -> U
In flickr in the gimp user group there are several sharpening procedure
outlined. search thereGreat group of people btw.
> From: nor...@littletank.org
> To: Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:47:26 +0100
> Subject: [Gimp-user] sharpening
>
> Quite some time ago a
> Filters --> Enhance --> Sharpen
>
> Things break up after around 70%
> Any time I resize any image I need to resharpen it.
>
> If enhance/sharpen is grayed out make sure the image is RGB
>
> Image --> Mode --> RGB
Thanks Bob, but what I looking for is not part of the Gimp menu.
Norman
___
On Friday 24 July 2009 12:40:42 am Erik Lotspeich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have OpenSUSE 11.1 and Gimp 2.6.2. I am having a serious
> problem with printing that I cannot figure out.
>
> For background, I've used Gimp since 1997 and I'm no novice to
> Gimp, Linux, or Unix.
>
> That being said, I found th
Filters --> Enhance --> Sharpen
Things break up after around 70%
Any time I resize any image I need to resharpen it.
If enhance/sharpen is grayed out make sure the image is RGB
Image --> Mode --> RGB
Norman Silverstone wrote:
> Quite some time ago a method for sharpening was given here and whi
Quite some time ago a method for sharpening was given here and which I
have enjoyed using. Unfortunately, I have lost my notes and I would be
grateful if the method could be posted again, please.
Norman
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Ber
The page at http://www.gimp.org/windows/ says "It is highly recommended
that you install the help files (GIMP User Manual) that are provided as
a separate package (see above). The documentation is also available
online," but it doesn't provide a link to whatever one needs to download
to obtain the
On 07/27/2009 11:10 AM, Marc T. wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:30 +0200, Marc T. wrote:
>>> i am on a similar problem,
>>> i have to build a batch script that slices over 6000 images very big
> images
>>> into seven pieces.
>> David's Batch Processor should be able to do the job, not by slicing
>On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:30 +0200, Marc T. wrote:
>> i am on a similar problem,
>> i have to build a batch script that slices over 6000 images very big
images
>> into seven pieces.
>
>David's Batch Processor should be able to do the job, not by slicing but
>by cropping each slice out of the image
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:30 +0200, Marc T. wrote:
> i am on a similar problem,
> i have to build a batch script that slices over 6000 images very big images
> into seven pieces.
David's Batch Processor should be able to do the job, not by slicing but
by cropping each slice out of the image one at
i am on a similar problem,
i have to build a batch script that slices over 6000 images very big images
into seven pieces.
>> > I think you would be better off doing this using ImageMagick and a
shell
ImageMagick seems to first read all images into memory and then working with
it.
and this dosn
> I guess that it is possible your theory is correct and that this is the
> motivation.
>
> Since printing with Gimp on Vista does not work properly, it calls this
> theory into question, however.
You have a point. However, my view has always been that, although it is
great that the bulk of soft
Hi Norman,
I guess that it is possible your theory is correct and that this is the
motivation.
Since printing with Gimp on Vista does not work properly, it calls this
theory into question, however.
Regards,
Erik
Norman Silverstone wrote:
> < snip >
>
>> Just imagine a novice Linux user. Imag
16 matches
Mail list logo
