> On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 21:09 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
>> On Monday 20 July 2009 07:00:08 pm Jernej SimonÄiÄ wrote:
>> > On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:47:53 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
>> > > The version that matches the version of Gimp in the tarball is
>> > > what should be included IMO.
>> >
>
>
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 21:09 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
> On Monday 20 July 2009 07:00:08 pm Jernej Simončič wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:47:53 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
> > > The version that matches the version of Gimp in the tarball is
> > > what should be included IMO.
> >
Ah, the old W
Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:47:53 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
The version that matches the version of Gimp in the tarball is what
should be included IMO.
Should GIMP then also include matching GTK+ and GLib? And other mandatory
dependencies?
libc?
On Monday 20 July 2009 07:00:08 pm Jernej Simončič wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:47:53 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
> > The version that matches the version of Gimp in the tarball is
> > what should be included IMO.
>
> Should GIMP then also include matching GTK+ and GLib? And other
> mandatory de
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:47:53 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
> The version that matches the version of Gimp in the tarball is what
> should be included IMO.
Should GIMP then also include matching GTK+ and GLib? And other mandatory
dependencies?
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored
On 07/20/2009 11:47 PM, John Culleton wrote:
> The version that matches the version of Gimp in the tarball is what
> should be included IMO.
There is no version of GEGL that matches a given version of GIMP. GEGL
is a library with an API (currently somewhat unstable due to
immatureness of the lib
On Monday 20 July 2009 05:25:12 pm Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 07/20/2009 11:20 PM, John Culleton wrote:
> > I see no compelling reason not to include the libs in the
> > tarball.
>
> What is so problematic about fetching the libs from ftp.gimp.org?
>
That is certainly an improvement over searchin
On 07/20/2009 11:20 PM, John Culleton wrote:
> I see no compelling reason not to include the libs in the tarball.
What is so problematic about fetching the libs from ftp.gimp.org?
If you suggest we should have the actual babl and GEGL code in the GIMP
tarball, this is a bad idea. babl and GEGL a
On Monday 20 July 2009 03:41:14 pm Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 07/20/2009 09:35 PM, John Culleton wrote:
> > On Sunday 19 July 2009 05:13:06 am you wrote:
> >> On 07/19/2009 03:16 AM, John Culleton wrote:
> >> > IMO
> >>>
> >>> these required libraries should be embedded in the Gimp
> >>> relea
On Sunday 19 July 2009 04:22:39 pm laurenp...@aol.com wrote:
> I'm a beginner and need to learn the basics. If there are
> tutorials where can I find them?
>
> LNF
There are lots of tutorials floating around, but I find the old book
_Grokking the Gimp_ or the newer book _The Artist's Guide to Gim
On 07/20/2009 09:35 PM, John Culleton wrote:
> On Sunday 19 July 2009 05:13:06 am you wrote:
>> On 07/19/2009 03:16 AM, John Culleton wrote:
>> > IMO
>>> these required libraries should be embedded in the Gimp release
>>> itself but there may be turf issues that prevent that.
>> Embedding babl a
quarta, 15 de julho de 2009,
Freddy Freeloader escreveu:
>Richard H. wrote:
>>> Aren't most GNU/Linux distributions installing by default a mail
>>> transfer agent like exim or postfix? Debian at least does this, and
>>> then the plug-in works.
>>>
>>
>> Please consider that a mail server al
>When I take 20 pictures, I have to edit 20 pictures with Gimp. That means
>opening up every single picture in Gimp. That is a tedious affair.
>
>Is it possible to do that all at once? Most of the time I just have to use
>the automatic white balance function with the Gimp.
>
>It would save me a tre
13 matches
Mail list logo
