Re: [Gimp-user] Switch to "docked"/integrated IDE (possible) ?

2009-02-19 Thread Michael J. Hammel
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 18:10 +0100, Ben Stover wrote: > Yes, I know Gimp consists by default of various independent sub-pane-windows. > But I could imagine that these independent window look can be reverted back > to either > a fixed-docked (=when one pane is moved then all others are moved as well

[Gimp-user] Switch to "docked"/integrated IDE (possible) ?

2009-02-19 Thread Ben Stover
Yes, I know Gimp consists by default of various independent sub-pane-windows. But I could imagine that these independent window look can be reverted back to either a fixed-docked (=when one pane is moved then all others are moved as well) or even a fully integrated software tool. Is this possibl

Re: [Gimp-user] How to do this?

2009-02-19 Thread Claus Cyrny
vicky aur wrote: > Hi all, > > How do I make a photograph to look like this? > http://customize.org/wallpapers/52351 This example is actually a vector drawing. Taking into account that you're new to Gimp, I would rather suggest using a vector graphics program such as Inkscape (you can download th

Re: [Gimp-user] How to do this?

2009-02-19 Thread Elwin Estle
Do a google on vexels or vectoring. There are some tutorials on Gimptalk by curly haired boy on how to do something like this. There is also lots of stuff on deviantart. You can do this technique in either Inkscape or Gimp, tho the methods are a bit different in each program. You can end up

Re: [Gimp-user] How to do this?

2009-02-19 Thread Daniel Hornung
On Thursday 19 February 2009, vicky aur wrote: > Hi all, > > How do I make a photograph to look like this? > http://customize.org/wallpapers/52351 > > This is my first post. If i have missed some guidelines, please > redirect me to proper channel. > > Thanks, > Vicky Was that made from a photograp

Re: [Gimp-user] Script-Fu

2009-02-19 Thread Frantz de Germain
Le Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:33:36 -0500 saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com écrivait: > You still can (and will) use 'set!' in your scripts; but you need to > create the variable first. Previously, the variable would be created > automatically if it did not exist. Allright, thanks for the info